|
CLIFTON BEACH
CLIFTON
BEACH
Ghariboon
ka Sahil, Ameeron ka Sahil
CLIFTON
BEACH
Ghariboon
ka Sahil, Ameeron ka Sahil
By
Arif
Hasan
(20
June 2005)
The
Defence Housing Authority has taken over the Clifton Beach and developed it
from McDoland’s to the Salt and Pepper Restaurant. A stone embankment wall
has been built on which people can sit and view the sea; a well paved
service lane and parking for cars have been provided; on a one kilometre
stretch steps leading to the beach have been built on which attractive
seating arrangements for visitors have been developed; well designed kiosks
supplying food and drinks have been placed along the promenade; and in
addition, flood lights now light the entire beach. This development is
indeed a valuable addition to Karachi’s recreational facilities. Thousands
of people, old and young, men, women and children, visit it every week and
enjoy themselves. Yet, there is a down side to this development and this
piece is all about that down side.
While
I was walking one day along the beautifully designed promenade I saw two
persons in blue uniform manhandling a pappar wala. They had taken
away his pappar bag. They were dragging him away by his hair and
cursing him. On inquiry, I was told by the uniformed men that they were DHA
security persons and they had orders not to permit vendors from frequenting
the beach between McDoland’s and the Salt and Pepper Restaurant. “But if
vendors are not permitted then what can people buy for food?” I inquired.
The uniformed persons responded that they can purchase food from the kiosks
provided by the DHA. Since I had purchased from the kiosks, I knew that it
was far too expensive for poor families to afford. Immediately, it occurred
to me that by banishing vendors from the beach the DHA had also banished the
poor. I requested the Urban Resource Centre (URC) to initiate a small
research on the subject and I made some further enquiries myself.
The
research and enquiries reveal that the DHA has banned all chabbari walas,
ketley chai walas, pappar walas, channa and mongphalli
walas, bunder ka tamasha walas and jogis from the beach.
The only food now available along the DHA occupied stretch is at the kiosks
set up by the DHA, the Pizza Express outlet which is located in a container
on the promenade, and the Walls Ice Cream mobile which is permitted to
operate on the beach. The prices of food and drinks from these outlets are
unaffordable to poor and lower middle income families. A comparison of these
prices and what is available at the two locations is given in the attached
Box. As a result, the poor no longer frequent the DHA occupied stretch of
Clifton Beach. They now visit the beach accessed from the Jahangir Kothari
Parade. Unlike the DHA occupied beach, there are no cars parked along this
stretch. The people who visit it are visibly more badly dressed,
comparatively under nourished, wearing inferior clothes and with children
who often do not wear shoes. The difference is startling. However, this
stretch of beach is more colourful as there are camels, horses and rehris
all beautifully decorated and women too wear reds and oranges and bright
blues. There are places at the exit of the beach where there are
arrangements for washing your feet and shoes.
Muhammad
Shoaib visits this stretch of beach every Sunday with his five children and
his wife. He comes all the way from Baldia. He does not go to the DHA
occupied stretch although he says that it is much more attractive and he
would love to go there but if he goes there and gives in to his children’s
demands, he will end up spending more than 200 Rupees. If on the other hand,
he does not give in to his children’s demand, they will be unhappy and
will look down on him. In addition, unlike before the place has changed and
he feels uncomfortable there since people like him no longer visit that
stretch of beach. He says that the DHA occupied beach is now called Ameeron
ka Sahil and the stretch that he now frequents is called Gharaiboon
ka Sahil.
Tasnim
teaches at a government school. She is 22 years old and lives in Baloch
Colony. She and her friends visit Gharaiboon ka Sahil regularly but
they prefer the DHA occupied stretch. When they receive their salaries at
the beginning of the month, they visit Ameeron ka Sahil and enjoy
spending some of what they have earned.
Both
Tasnim and Muhammad Shoaib have heard that the entire beach is going to be
developed for rich people. These rumours are floating around the sea front.
They are worried that they and their families will loose the only
inexpensive recreational area left in the city. “Wherever you go now you
have to pay. Travel costs have become high. At Allauddin Park and at Fun
Land they rob you. Where should poor people take their families?” asks
Muhammad Shoaib. He adds “why do they not just gather us together and
throw their atom bomb on us? It would be easier for them and for us.”
Meanwhile,
the pappar, chai, channa walas still try and operate on
the sly on the DHA occupied beach. When they are caught by the DHA “daroghas”
they are cursed, beaten and their goods taken or thrown away. Another
punishment that is meted out is to put them in a car and leave them far away
at a lonely spot so that they have to walk back. Many of the chabbari
walas are young boys in their early teens and URC interviews of them
show that they come from the very poor backgrounds and some of them have to
borrow money on a daily basis to be able to purchase their sellable items.
Altaf is 16 years old and sells pappar. He has been caught twice by
the daroghas. I asked him as to why he does not sell at the Gharaiboon ka
Sahil. He responds that there are already too many people selling there
and also that he has been selling on this beach since he was 7 years old. He
feels he has a claim to sell here. In addition, he says that the people
selling on the other beach will not allow him to sell there since it would
affect their sales adversely. He wants to know if the DHA daroghas have the
right to treat the vendors as they do. “They are not the police, they are
not the law, but then where can a poor man seek justice? If I go to the
police, they will lock me up.”
There
is also a bunder wala. He is over 55 years of age. His bunder’s
(monkey’s) name is Aloo Master. He says that he has performed on
this beach for more than 25 years. He cannot do that anymore. He also feels
that both he and Aloo Master have a claim on this stretch of beach.
“Rich people do not like poor people but they do like animals. For Aloo
Master’s sake they should let us perform. I can hardly feed him now. He
puts with starvation without complaining for he understands the problem. For
the poor there is no sunwai.”
Karachi
has lost all its multi-class recreational and entertainment places. Saddar,
the old town institutional and community buildings and spaces, cinemas, have
all gone. They have been the victims of massive environmental degradation,
absence of social and cultural considerations in urban planning, and an
elite that has chosen to ghettoize itself out of fear and ignorance and in
the process it has usurped the city’s natural assets for its own benefit.
Clifton Beach has been an exception to this, but not any more.
The
DHA occupied beach can be given back its multi-class environment without
adversely affecting the facilities and ambiance that the DHA has provided. Chabbri
walas and vendors can be provided special spaces within which they can
operate and areas can be reserved for bunder and snake ka tamashas.
If the poor and rich cannot share public space, then we are heading for
major conflicts similar to those in Johannesburg and Rio de Janeiro and the
rich will be as much the victims as the poor.
Box:
A comparison of Rates: Survey of Clifton and Sea View (DHA Occupied) Beach
|
S.
No. |
Item |
Rate
at Clifton Beach |
Rate
at Sea View |
|
1.
|
Local
cold drink |
Rs
2 |
None |
|
2.
|
Branded
cold drink |
Rs
12 |
Rs
12 |
|
3. |
Tea |
Normal
Rs 6
Doodh
patti Rs 10
|
Rs
10
- |
|
4. |
Juice |
Rs
10 |
Rs
12
|
|
5. |
Biryani |
Small
plate Rs 5
Large
plate Rs 10
|
Not
available (NA) |
|
6. |
Polka/Walls
Ice Cream |
Kulfa
Rs 5
Cup
Rs 10
Corentto
Rs 20
|
Chock
bar Rs 15
Feast
Rs 25
Cornetto
Rs 25 |
|
7. |
Pappar |
Rs
5 |
NA
|
|
8.
|
Kite |
Small
size Rs 10
Large
size Rs 15
|
Rs
15
Rs
20 |
|
9.
|
Burger |
Round
Rs 10
Large
Rs 15 |
Chicken
Burger Rs 35
Beef
Burger Rs 25
|
|
10. |
Sandwich
|
NA |
Rs
15 |
|
11.
|
Coffee |
NA |
Rs
20 |
|
12.
|
Rolf |
NA |
Chicken
Rs 25
Beef
Rs 15
|
|
13. |
Showarma
|
NA |
Rs
40 |
|
14.
|
Broast
quarter |
NA |
Half
Rs 60
Full
Rs 120
|
|
15.
|
Head
massage |
Rs
10 |
NA |
|
16.
|
Samossa |
Rs
2.50 |
NA |
|
17.
|
Doorbeen
(5-10 minutes) |
Rs
5 |
NA |
|
18.
|
Chaat |
Small
Rs 10
Large
Rs 15
|
NA |
Source:
Urban Resource Centre Survey.
Clifton
Beach
Shrinking
for the poor
Bagh
Ibne Qasim Ist phase completed
BY JAMIL KHAN
KARACHI - The first phase of the multimillion Bagh Ibne Qasim project had
been completed and the remaining was expected to be completed in February
2006, said District Officer, Parks and Horticulture, Liaquat Ali Khan on
Saturday.
Talking to The Nation, DO Liaquat Ali said that the first phase of the
project would be opened for public on November 26 and President General
Pervez Musharraf was likely to inaugurate it.
He said that the project worth Rs 600 million, including construction of
funland, aquarium, beach park, parking lots and others was started in July
this year and would be completed at the end of February 2006.
DO Liaquat said that the project of Bagh Ibne Qasim was one of the projects
which had been in limbo for the last 30 years but the caretaker City
government took a bold step to start work on the project on the instruction
of Governor Sindh Dr Ishratul Ebad.
“This will be a great achievement of the caretaker administration,” he
said adding that not only the Karachiites but also the entire Pakistanis
would have a big recreational park.”
“We are also planning to include other facilities like dolphin pool, mono
train, skating there.”.
Before
the beginning of the project, the City government had removed about 400
shops and other structures that had been constructed illegally there, he
said adding that this was the only largest project which would be completed
in six months, he said.
Responding to a question, he said that about 50 per cent of work on the park
had been completed, and the remaining would be finished in February, as
various contractors were working round-the-clock to complete it on time.
He further said that the Beach Park had been constructed on 47 acres of land
at the cost of Rs 260 million. The facilities included pathways, domes of
the pattern of Kothari Parade, concrete benches, marble canopies, electric
floodlights, fencing, and playing ground for the children, he added. He
further said that the work on the construction of pathways, jogging tracks,
domes of the pattern of Kothari Parade, benches, electric lights, fencing
and playing area of children was in progress and the entire area would be
open for public soon.
The development work at aquarium and funland was also underway and the these
would be completed in February.
The funland, which had existed in the middle of Bagh Ibne Qasim, had now
been shifted at one of the sides of the park to provide a maximum space for
children so that they had maximum amusement.
He also mentioned that in the whole area there would be six parking spaces
to park around 3,000 vehicles, saying that 50 per cent work had been
completed on this project.
The City District Government Karachi has decided to auction the food court
and parking spaces on short-term lease.
(Daily
The Nation 20/11/05 )
The
battering of our beaches
By
Ardeshir
Cowasjee
February
19, 2006
AS announced in the headline over a news item in this newspaper on February
7, ‘The Supreme Court puts public interest over private profit.’ The
previous day, a three-member bench led by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad
Chaudhry cancelled a lease awarded by the Capital Development Authority to a
Lahore businessman who had planned to develop a mini-golf club in a public
park in Sector F-7, Islamabad.
The chief justice stressed that the laws of the CDA are clear: public parks,
graveyards, incidental open spaces, etc., will be developed by the authority
only and he advised the CDA that if it allowed people to haphazardly start
commercial activities in public spaces it would “repent not adhering to
its original policy.”
Now, the ocean foreshore of Karachi is the heritage of all Pakistanis,
including our future generations, held as a public trust by the government
of the day. It is non-sustainable; once it is gone, it is gone. The city’s
population is increasing by 500,000 a year. We need all our beaches to cater
for increased recreational needs.
Beaches are not a luxury. They are public spaces that provide a different
set of rhythms for the renewal of public life. Beaches are democratic
commons that bring people together to stroll, to paddle, swim, splash in the
waves, ‘watch’ the surf, and gaze into the sunset. Public access to the
beach is integral to democracy and equality.
Karachi is almost destitute of parks and playgrounds and open spaces. It has
fewer acres of such spaces per 1,000 residents as compared to any major city
in the developed world. There are also vast disparities in the access to
parks and recreation. In middle and low-income areas citizens do not have,
near enough, open spaces in their neighbourhoods — but they do have more
than their fair share of toxic waste and pollutants. The middle and
lower-income groups, to be able to breathe, throng to our public beaches on
public holidays and weekends.
What atrocity has already been perpetrated on the Clifton beach? The city
government has built two parallel parapets which hide the sea from public
view. Parapets are normally hip-high as were the parapets built by Sir
Jehangir Kothari in 1912, still standing for all to emulate. What our city
government, obsessed with size, has built is head-high. Why? Could it be to
enrich the brick makers and layers? The factotums responsible need to do
something to rectify this folly. How the citizens have reacted can be gauged
from the number of letters to the editors of all our newspapers that have
appeared in print, all objecting strongly to the fact that the sea has been
obliterated from the much vaunted park by the sea.
And further folly from our MQM Minister for Ports & Shipping, Babar
Ghauri. Whilst once in Jeddah on one of the many ‘official’ visits our
ministers indulge in, he spotted a water jet spouting high into the air in
front of the royal palaces. In search of glory, he ordered the Karachi Port
Trust to have it replicated in Karachi’s sea, without bothering about how
much it would cost to purchase, instal and operate. Who has it enriched, and
on which continent? Ghauri’s approach is totally in line with the
ministerial norm, but what we must have difficulty in believing is that not
one of the dozen or so KPT trustees, who hold the people’s money in trust,
recorded a note of dissent.
It was ‘wah-wah, minister sahib’ all the way — there was not one man
amongst them. This has also enraged a large number of citizens who have
publicly in print expressed their disgust — one excellent thing is that
now people are becoming aware of their rights and of their government’s
extravaganzas and waste of public funds and are loudly and clearly voicing
their discontent.
Now to the real danger. In April 2005, five concerned citizens of the
Defence Housing Authority approached the Sindh High Court (CP 403/05)
seeking to save a section of the beach, the 13-acre ‘Usmani Park’
(between Beach Avenue and the sea) from being converted into a gigantic
shopping, entertainment and residential project. In January 2006, the NGO
Shehri intervened in the petition and has placed a number of facts on
record. It has been pointed out that if the DHA is allowed to get away with
this ‘privatization’ of the public beach, it will not be too long before
attempts are made to exploit and privatize the other few amenities, spaces
and facilities that are left to us — even perhaps the very air we breathe.
The petition states that the sea-shore conversion project is in violation of
the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997. Increased commercialization
will cause pollution, destroy marine micro-organisms, and will result in the
extinction or mass reduction of fish, turtles, and coastal birds, and also
in the depletion of the sea-food industry. Additionally, a Sindh government
notification of May 1975 prohibits the leasing of land within the area of
the ports or sea shore limits. The beaches around the DHA are within the
port limits of the Karachi Port Trust and the Port Qasim Authority.
DHA has a grand plan to convert 14 km of “virgin, unspoilt (sic)
waterfront” (quoted in a DHA newsletter) into a $-600 million series of
playgrounds and leisure/pleasure spots called the “DHA Waterfront
Development Project” to afford the rich and affluent of Karachi “the
luxuries of an aristocratic life”. This extravaganza consists of seven
Zones (A to G) with expensive commercial, entertainment, residential,
commercial, hotel and office buildings, and includes “reclamation of 74.5
acres of land, for high-end Hotel Complex”, “5-star hotels owning
private segments of the beach” and a “private beach with lagoon for
hotel & residential blocks”.
Apparently, various MOUs have been entered into with local and foreign
parties to ‘privatize’ and ‘develop’ the seashore. Such
extravaganzas will disenfranchise 95 per cent of the residents of Karachi
from over 30 per cent of the 42-km urban beachfront of their city.
In the Zone-A, Usmani Park plot, three structures, have been planned for
construction by a developer: a five-storey (900,000 sq ft) shopping mall and
entertainment complex with hyper-market, cineplex, ice-skating rink, food
court, retail shops, gaming arcade, and so on; a 50-storey commercial office
tower, and a 50-storey hotel and apartment tower. In keeping with the norm,
no thought has been given to the traffic and parking chaos that will be
generated, nor of the unbearable load on the utilities — water,
electricity and sewerage, etc. Additionally, the view of the sea of all
houses along Beach Avenue will be blocked.
In December 2005, the DHA invited expressions of interest for development of
a 48-acre recreational Zone-B (located between MacDonald’s and Kinara
restaurants, in front of Seaview Apartments) which includes a 600-ft. high
‘Monumental Tower’ and an amphitheatre on reclaimed land.
Public access to the beach is protected under the public trust doctrine.
Beaches enjoy a special amenity status with all the protection that the law
affords to public amenity land. In recent years, the protests of citizens
about the commercialization of beaches along the Clifton sea-shore and
beyond have been mounting, but are totally ignored by the rapaciously greedy
DHA and the concerned government authorities.
The outcome of the petition will determine whether or not only the rich and
powerful have the right to the benefit of the Almighty’s bounty and will
establish whether or not the wealthy and influential can usurp for their
selfish private use a natural facility and resource that should by right be
enjoyed by each and every citizen without distinction.
(Daily
Dawn February 19, 2006)
Beach
fences
FOR
a long time Clifton beach has been the most popular recreation spot for
Karachiites and those coming from upcountry. This beach, in continuation
with Bagh Ibne Qasim, has been lying undeveloped for decades. It is the only
sizeable Karachi beach left over by the land mafia. (It is learnt that Bagh
Ibn-i-Qasim was 150 acres and is now down to only 80 acres.)
Recently I was taken aback to notice that one won’t be able to have a view
of the sea any more while driving on the double road running parallel to the
bank of the sea as two parallel fencing walls have been raised in between.
The town planners (KDA) of the good old days had very wisely taken a policy
decision that no such structures would be allowed in the area between “Hawa
Bandar” (helipad area) and the sea that may impede a clear view of the
sea. The city government is now defying its own rules.
The strip of land alongside the coast at Clifton was reserved by KDA
planners as elbow room for free and easy movement of crowds and for
provision of sitting, relaxing and camping facilities. By constructing walls
around these belts, the very purpose of this space has been defeated and
thereby adversely affected the beauty and utility of the beach.
As regards Bagh Ibne Qasim, a fence of the same design is being constructed
around it also. Here the purpose of having a boundary wall is different. It
should provide security and check trespass. The design and height do not
cater for either of these requirements. Proper maintenance of the park,
therefore, will be difficult.
UMER FAROOQUE KHAN Karachi Daily Dawn November
13, 2005
Road
closure irks people
KARACHI:
Thousands of citizens, who came at the Clifton beach during Eid days, faced
number of hardships due to the closure of various roads, leading to the
venue.
Likewise
every year, a large number of people came to Clifton from every area of the
city for spending their holiday. However, this year they faced immense
problems while reaching the area, as they found a number of roads closed.
Many of the visitors, including children and women, left their vehicles to
reach their destination on foot.
Officials,
however, described the closure of roads as a precautionary measure for
stopping people to visit Bagh Ibn-e-Qasim and Beach Park, which were under
construction. They claimed that in order to avoid any inconvenience to the
people, they had made prior announcement regarding closure of some roads.
They maintained that many roads leading to Sea View were opened for
vehicular traffic.
People
said that the closure of roads should be publicised properly and the
authorities concerned must devise an alternate routes.
(Daily
The News 7/11/05)
An
unending municipal scam: CITYSCAPES
By
Fahim Zaman Khan
HOW
does one report an unending municipal scam without annoying the
beneficiaries or the self-serving rulers? The ongoing saga in Bagh-i-Ibn
Qasim, located below Jehangir Kothari Parade, concerning more than 80 acres
of prime Clifton land at Scheme V is one more tale of wholesale fraud, con
and swindle of our successive rulers and mandarins of civic agencies. This
sad spectacle of pillage and corruption continues unabated even today.
The record of land allotments pertaining to Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim at the defunct
KMC or the KDA may be as elusive as grass in that park. The little record in
the form of duplicate files available with the estate department may be
useful to the extent of renewal of lease, yet nothing contained within them
may corroborate what exists on the ground. Nor does anything on the existing
statues allow disposal of this precious asset as being currently hatched.
At least on paper the defunct KMC’s original share in the development of
Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim was limited to about four acres of ‘Terraced gardens,
Aquarium and an Aquatic Park.’ No doubt, an aquarium and terraced gardens
were developed by the KMC, however the rooftop was quickly allotted to ‘the
Kishtiwallas,’ well known for their Jamaat connection, and so were 3,000
square yards of land out of the space earmarked for an aquatic park. With
further allotments of 6,000 square yards, during PB Gillani’s
administration and by the KMC councils during the mid-1980s, the fate of the
aquatic park was sealed forever. Many old-timers bet their life that the
original KMC files missing from the record could be recovered from under
lock and key of the promoters/beneficiaries of the Funland that now probably
spreads over 20 acres of land that no employee of the City District
Government Karachi is willing to measure or document.
The KDA or its masters could not afford to risk their reputation by staying
behind the KMC. Several plots of land with a commercial value of more than
hundred thousand rupees per square yard were allotted in violation of
universally-accepted laws and norms governing sanctity of public parks and
playgrounds. For example, ST-1/A was created out of 7,972 square yards of
parkland and allotted at the rate of Rs17.50 per square yard for a swimming
pool, 25,000 square yards as ST-14 and 20,000 square yards as ST-16 were
allotted at the rate of Rs40 per square yard. 4,005 square yards of parkland
were allotted as ST-16/A and 18,000 sq yards as ST-16/B during 1992 at the
rate of Rs250 per square yard for a museum of modern arts and a school; and
3,000 square yards were allotted as ST-17 for an acupuncture clinic at the
rate of Rs30 per square yard.
Many buildings and structures, including a private school and a restaurant,
allotted in Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim, remain functional today. The construction of
Costa Livina, a highrise project being built on land originally allotted for
a revolving restaurant, remains suspended due to litigation. The KDA also
cancelled the allotment of 350 shops during 1996, but the six residential
plots allotted to federal secretaries and high officials at the KDA nursery
located within the boundaries of Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim survived cancellation
probably due to kinship.
During 1994, a cash-strapped KDA transferred Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim, along with
the rest of the amenities of Kehkashan Scheme V, to the KMC for maintenance
purposes. The then KMC administration moved a summary to the chief minister
requesting him to direct the KDA to cancel all illegal allotments made on
the parkland.
Syed Abdullah Shah, then chief minister, wrote on the summary “I agree
with administrator KMC, parkland must be reverted back to the city.”
Subsequently, the KDA issued cancellation orders citing violation of clause
Nos 6, 8 and 12 of the terms and conditions of the above allotments. The
land thus acquired was also transferred to the KMC. However, the aggrieved
parties immediately moved the Sindh High Court where luckily Chief Justice
Wajihuddin Ahmed decided to hear those petitions himself. The KMC also moved
the office of the Deputy Commissioner South to initiate acquisition
proceedings for it. The matter remains pending at the Sindh High Court,
while the defunct KMC and its successor has been trying to green the
remaining acreage.
Last year the KDA recovered from the KMC Bagh-i-Ibn Qasim along with other
parks and playgrounds in many affluent areas. The KMC had auctioned the
University Road Sunday Bazaar opposite Safari Park during the year 2000 for
Rs3 million. Once its control was reverted to the KDA last year this Bazaar
was allowed without auction for a mere Rs600,000 and this year for Rs one
million.
On 6th June 2002 our Nazim-i-Aala Naimatullah Khan signed an MoU with
Sarfaraz H. Rizvi of City Trading and Contracting Company registered in
Qatar for the development of a park.
What Mr. Khan and Executive District Officer Brigadier Zaheer Qadri,
formerly DG KDA, do not seem to realize that as soon as this agreement is
signed the parties aggrieved by the previous cancellation orders shall have
a cause to move the Sindh High Court demanding restoration of their
so-called cancelled properties killing the plan for a water-cum-amusement
park.
After eating up huge spaces between the illegally-allotted plots the ever-
enlarging Funland has now opened a gate on the park’s side. The unfolding
saga of a water-cum-amusement park could well be a ploy to deprive the
people of the city of a precious parkland. It may be a conspiracy by the
aggrieved parties who have lost billions and billions of rupees worth of
ill-gotten park property that was collectively ours.
(Daily
Dawn 27 September 2002)
Bagh-e-Ibn-e-Qasim
project
KARACHI:
Plans to develop the massive US$200 million Karachi Beach Theme Park Resort
in Clifton have moved one stage forward with an announcement by the UK
developers, Deighton International (DI), that they have now secured the
necessary investment. The Chairman, Philip D. Deighton, of DI said,
"Since the City District Government Karachi has awarded us the scheme,
our efforts are on to sourcing the substantial funds necessary to enable
this unique park to go ahead with." He went on to say, "It was now
much more important for his company and the CDGK to collaborate closely to
make sure this important venture becomes a success for the benefit of the
people of Karachi. "Bagh-Ibn-e-Qasim is a world class site and we
intend to deliver a world-class attraction," said Deighton.
(The
News 24/11/05)
PM
reviews progress on Jahangir Kothari parade renovation
KARACHI:
Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz reviewed on Saturday the work being carried out
to renovate and develop the Jahangir Kothari Parade and Bagh Ibn-e-Qasim
under a mega-recreational project along the Clifton Beach.
According
to a press release issued here, the Prime Minister, who visited the site,
termed the work a good step for the progress of the metropolis. He
appreciated the work, which according to him, would play an important role
in the preservation of the city’s beauty.
Sindh
Governor Dr Ishratul Ebad Khan briefed the PM over the beach development
project. He himself took a round of various portions of the Jahangir Kothari
Parade.
He
said that with the passage of time, the recreational and historical places
of the city were dwindling. As such, he said he was all the more pleased to
see this project. He said that there was a time people from across the
country used to visit the Clifton beach and if development continued the way
it is, the project would become the best recreational place not only for
people of Karachi but of Pakistan.
He
said that the Gwadar and other such projects showed that the government was
taking all-out steps for the development and prosperity of the country.
INQUIRY:
Regarding the incident in which many people were severely affected after
consuming contaminated water in the Landhi area, the Prime Minister said
that an inquiry was under way and he himself talked to the provincial
government authorities in this regard.
(Daily
The News 18 septeber 2005)
Lack
of investment policy mars CDGK’s projects
KARACHI:
Billions of rupees worth investment projects hit snags due to lack of any
investment policy in City District Government Karachi (CDGK).
CDGK,
which launched several mega investment projects since its inception in 2001,
has remained unable to formulate investment policy owing to lack of
commitment on part of authorities concerned. These mega projects include
Bagh-e-Ibn Qasim, Development of Beaches, Water Treatment Plant, Waste to
Energy, Development of Parks, Food Street, Revival of Cottage Industrial
Zones and some others.
However,
very little progress has been made on these projects so far and there seems
no effective strategy to expedite the pace of work on these projects.
According
to details, Bagh Ibn-e-Qasim project estimated cost stands at $300 million,
Waste to Energy around $200 million, Development of Beaches $800 million,
Development of Parks $50 million, some other projects $200 million etc.
Sources
told PPI on Monday that there are no prescribed rules and regulations for
investment in CDGK, which often keep away the investors to invest in CDGK’s
projects. Besides ‘One-Window’ operation necessary for facilitation of
investors has to be introduced by CDGK as yet.
"A
number of investors took keen interest in these projects and were ready to
invest in them. However, they ran away owing to non-cooperating attitude and
lack of commitment on part of CDGK’s authorities.
Another
factor obstructs flow of investment is absence of any streamlining in CDGK’s
departments. "Enterprise and Investment Department (E&IP),
specially established to deal with investment projects under SLGO, takes any
decision, but the other day, some other department comes up with the
queries, that make the investors to remain away from the project,"
sources said.
At
the time of launching of development of parks project, for instance, Parks
& Horticulture Department was asked to provide a list of sites for
parks. "Department provided 45 sites for the purpose, but when initial
modalities were being finalised, they informed that 40 of total 45 sites are
in litigation, subsequently jeopardising the whole project," they
added.
Acquisition
of land for projects has to pass through very lengthy and cumbersome
process, facing departmental and legal obstacles.
Despite
the repeated reminders of department concerned to take action in this
connection, authorities have yet to come up with a concrete and long-term
strategy," sources added.
(Daily
The News 25 August 2004)
CDGK
to launch Rs273m development projects
KARACHI:
The city government is going to launch new development works worth Rs273.8
million. The approval was given during a meeting of the city government
District Development Working Party, presided over by District Coordination
Officer (DCO) Fazlur Rahman, at Civic Centre on Monday.
Officers
concerned gave briefing to the meeting participants on new development
projects, including improvement of water and sewage lines, re-carpeting of
roads, beautification works under all flyovers, tree plantation in parks and
main roads, etc.
It
was also decided that coastal strip in front of Bagh Ibn-e-Qasim, Clifton,
falling in the city government limits, would be developed to facilitate
picnickers. The meeting also decided that trees would be planted in
abundance in Bagh Ibn-e-Qasim.
The
DCO, on the occasion, asked the parks department to submit a plan in
connection with the development of coastal strip. He also asked the officers
concerned to ensure the removal of all hurdles in the way of the proposed
projects, so that the work could be initiated at the earliest.
Rahman
said that the city government would ensure in-time completion of all the
projects and would never compromise on the quality and standard of work. He
asked the Executive District Officer, Works and Services, Shoaib Ahmed
Siddiqui, to keep paying visits to the site of the projects to keep an eye
on the pace and quality of work.
The
EDO (Finance), Shakil Naqvi, representatives of City Nazim Engineer Saleem
Azhar and Abid Ilyas, projects directors and other officers concerned also
attended the meeting.
(Daily
The News 7/12/04)
Fountain
for the poor, beaches for the rich
Khusro
Mumtaz
The federal minister for ports and shipping, Babar Khan Ghouri, like all his
fellow ministers and ministers of state and the illustrious citizens of this
country with the status of minister (the combined number of which is so
astronomical you need a high speed computer to keep their tally and their
endless perks and privileges straight), really feels for the poor and
underprivileged. He feels for them so much that he’s gone and built them a
650-foot high fountain (the second highest in the world) in Karachi so that
they don’t have to bear the onerous cost of travelling to Switzerland for
some rest and recreation. The mystery of why Pakistan’s commercial capital
had to be presented with this supreme gift has finally been solved. And I’m
not making any of this up. Mr Ghouri made his declaration on the floor of
the National Assembly itself.
Let’s get this straight then. People in Karachi don’t have safe drinking
water and the city’s sanitation, sewage and drainage system is in the
worst shape possible (witness the havoc wreaked by the recent rains) and
millions of its residents are slum dwellers yet Mr. Ghouri thinks it’s a
good idea to spend Rs320 million not on fixing these problems or on funding
schools and health clinics for the poor but on a fountain. A fountain that
when it does work (by design — reportedly — it remains inoperative for
half the year) sends water shooting uselessly up into the sky so that poor
people — repeat, “poor people” — can gawk at it while holding on to
their starving and parched children. Brings to mind Coleridge’s lines: “Water,
water everywhere / Nor a drop to drink”.
Even if we accept that this is just what the poverty-stricken multitude of
Karachi has been asking for and hence is forever in the sympathetic minister’s
debt somebody still needs to tell Mr Ghouri of the Defence Housing Authority’s
latest scheme. The DHA has plans which are well underway for a waterfront
project that, once completed, may not even let his “poor people” of the
city anywhere near the fountain or the Clifton beach area. According to the
DHA’s own press release of February 2005, it has initiated a US$623
million commercial (emphasis mine) project that will cover the 14-kilometre
long stretch of beach from the site of the abandoned old casino up to the
Golf Club.
The project envisages a “shopping mall with best entertainment facilities,
a food court, a hype-market, in-line retail, covered/open car parking,
gaming facilities, ground-plus six storey buildings, commercial office
towers, go-kart track facilities and service apartments”. It also includes
an exclusive (emphasis mine) high-rise residential complex over 10.3 acres
with 50-storey towers. 74 acres of land would be reclaimed (emphasis mine)
for these 50-storey residential/office monoliths, town houses, a five-star
hotel (but, of course) and a “most modern amphitheatre” and “most
modern and the state-of-art (sic) entertainment centre”. American and
Dubai-based companies are involved in the whole enterprise.
What all this 5-star exclusivity — an offering to the gods of
globalisation and commercialisation — translates to is the exclusion of
poor people from a public area the use of which they are entitled to by law.
Once completed, most of the project’s facilities will be free only to
those who can afford to pay for it. Those who can’t (meaning Mr Ghouri’s
favoured underprivileged souls), be damned. In fact, the poor are already
being made to feel unwelcome. The small-time hawkers, street vendors and
rehri-wallahs have been turned into persona non grata and are being deprived
of their livelihoods so that multinational food chains can take their place.
Our compassionate minister Ghouri needs to be told that the poor people that
he’s so concerned about don’t dream of travelling to Switzerland to look
at some water fountain. What they dream about is having electricity, clean
water, jobs, education, and food on the table for their families. For rest
and recreation they would be happy enough to go to the beach or to a nearby
public park. Lord knows Karachi needs many more public parks and green areas
for its 15 million residents, particularly the underprivileged ones. How
about building more public parks with public funds, Mr. Ghouri? How about
ensuring continued free access to public beaches — one of the very few
options available for some cheap, wholesome entertainment for the less
fortunate — for those who can’t afford to be gouged for the privilege?
There are also bigger issues to be considered here. Firstly, and most
importantly, it needs to be determined whether the DHA has any authority
over the Clifton beach. Beaches are legally meant for the public at large.
Can the DHA undertake a project which excludes a majority of the city’s
population? This also raises the issue of the legality and the process of
allocation of public land to the armed forces. But we’ll leave this very
important discussion for a future date.
In the meantime, the DHA needs to inform the public whether it has carried
out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) prior to the commencement of
the project. This is a requirement of the law (under the Pakistan
Environmental Protection Act, 1997) for projects of such magnitude.
Moreover, the findings of the EIA have to be put before the general public
and their opinions and concurrence sought before the project can proceed.
This means that it is our right as citizens of this city and this country to
participate in such a decision-making process. It is not just our right but
our obligation. We owe it to ourselves and to those who come after us. The
privileged among us owe it to the poverty-stricken, the disadvantaged, the
deprived. There are those among us who are guided not by their conscience
but by the lure of shekels — we can no longer afford to sit back and let
them determine our fates. The writer is a banker and freelance writer.
Email: khusro_m@yahoo.co.uk
(Daily
The News Monday, August 28, 2006)
No
alternative but to soldier on
By
Ardeshir Cowasjee
JUST before 0700 hours on August 24 the telephone rang. On the line was my
good friend, Dr Shershah Suri, urging me to act quickly, at once. Why? I
asked. Well, the party workers of the MQM are busy hacking off,
discriminately, the branches of the 100-year old trees that line Bunder
Road.
That day, the party was to organize a mass rally on Bunder Road to protest
against the MMA opposition to the passing of the amendment to the Hadood
Ordinances and it was planned that the party chief, self-exiled Altaf
Hussain Bhai would address the gathered faithful from the safety and comfort
of his north London suburban headquarters. The trees would obstruct the
sound of his voice — they had to be dealt with.
Who, I asked Shershah, is available at this time of the morning and who, if
available, will do anything to save the trees? The rally was held, the
entire city’s traffic was disrupted, the trees suffered, and Altaf Bhai’s
expected harangue, the voice of the famed Londoner, was not heard. Science
let us down.
The next day, the 25th, an invitation card arrived from the Pakistan
Association for Mental Health for a fund-raising gala evening. It bore
cheerful tidings which set the trend for that day:
“Every other house in Karachi has one or more persons taking
tranquillisers.
“Every fifth house has a psychosomatic/psychiatric problem disturbing
family members, the neighbourhood of society in general.
“Every tenth house has a psychiatric patient needing medical attention for
depression, psychosis, psychosomatic disorders, obsession, mental
retardation, epilepsy, and drug dependence.
“In Pakistan there are 16 million people who are mentally disturbed.
“In Karachi there are 16 hundred thousand people suffering from emotional,
intellectual and/or social adjustment disorders.
“Among them, at least three hundred thousand are those who need
psychiatric/psychological attention. They are likely to become a permanent
burden on society if not taken care of.”
On the morning of the 26th, Roland deSouza, chairperson of Shehri, appeared
with more good news to lighten up the day. This time it was about the
beaches of Karachi, or what remains of them. In April last year, five
concerned citizens of the Defence Housing Authority approached the Sindh
High Court (CP 403/05) seeking to save one section of the beach — the
13-acre Usmani Park, between Beach Avenue and the sea — from being
converted into yet another blight on our lives, another gigantic
shopping-cum-entertainment-cum-residential complex. Last January, Shehri too
intervened with a petition of its own. It was brought to the court’s
attention that if the DHA is allowed to get away with this ‘privatization’
of the public beach, it will have the adverse effect of encouraging other
parties to attempt to exploit and privatise what other few open spaces,
amenities and facilities are left for the people. Going overboard slightly,
Roland even suggested that the polluted air we breathe may even be in
danger.
As the petition states, the sea shore conversion project is in violation of
the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997. If this ‘development’ is
allowed, the increased commercialisation will add to the existing pollution.
It will destroy any surviving marine micro-organisms and will result in the
extinction or mass reduction of fish, turtles, and coastal birds, and in the
general depletion of the sea-food industry.
A Sindh government notification of May 1975 prohibits the leasing of land
within the area of the ports or sea shore limits. The beaches around the DHA
are within the limits of the Karachi Port Trust and the Port Qasim
Authority.
According to a DHA newsletter, the Authority has a grand plan to convert 14
kilometres of “virgin, unspoilt (sic) waterfront” into a $600 million
series of playgrounds and leisure/pleasure spots to be known as the ‘DHA
Waterfront Development Project’ which will provide to the rich and
affluent of Karachi “the luxuries of an aristocratic life”. This
extravaganza consists of seven zones with expensive commercial,
entertainment, residential, commercial, hotel and office buildings, and
includes the “reclamation of 74.5 acres of land, for a high-end Hotel
Complex,” and “5-star hotels owning private segments of the beach,”
and a “private beach with lagoon for hotel & residential blocks.”
The citizens must have a very convincing case because the DHA has finally
retained the professional services of two legal heavyweights — Makhdoom
Ali Khan, the Attorney-General of Pakistan, and Anwar Mansoor Khan, the
Advocate-General of Sindh, both acting in their private capacities — to
prove the citizens wrong.
After what we have suffered over the past month — and are still suffering
the after-effects, can this city really cope with these gimmicky development
schemes which only serve to line a few select pockets? Is there any
infrastructure to bear further so-called ‘development’ projects? This
city has 16 to 18 million inhabitants, nearly half of whom live in katchi
abadis. It has serious problems with its water supply, sewerage systems,
storm drainage, and electricity supply.
With the completion of the K-III water scheme, the Indus river supply
exceeds 550 million gallons per day (MGD = 1,000,000 GD) with a further
100MGD coming from the Hub dam. With 650MGD, Karachi’s inhabitants have
35-40 gallons available per head per day, a figure that is adequate in our
context. Yet water is not getting to all the people. The Karachi Water and
Sewerage Board’s contention that there is a 30 per cent (180MGD) leakage
seems exaggerated. The main reasons are theft, in equitable distribution,
and the absence of the writ of the government — anarchy and no Law and
Order, which is the responsibility of a government.
Of the 450MGD untreated sewage that flows into the gutters, approximately
100MGD is treated in three poorly operating sewage-treatment plants. So,
350MGD of untreated effluent flows into the Arabian Sea and into the creeks
around Karachi. This amount would fill some 40 super-tanker ships of
50,000-tonne capacity each on a daily basis. Do we qualify even as a second
world country?
The surface drainage of this city died with the recent rains — about three
inches only. Unplanned urbanisation, ad hoc construction, the closure of
natural nallahs and drains with illegal buildings will make this a recurring
problem. The administration has combined the sewerage and storm drainage
systems, but takes no steps to clean the drains before the monsoons.
The recently privatized KESC has inherited an overloaded and dilapidated
generation, transmission and distribution network, with a demand load of
about 2000MW, from which about 20 per cent of the available electricity is
stolen. The system collapsed at its weakest points during the downpour,
leaving many residential, commercial and industrial areas without power for
days on end. Many persons were electrocuted by fallen wires during the rain.
A well thought-out proactive, not reactive, methodology is required to
address the issues of the critical utilities in this city — not the
expropriation of whatever spaces are left open and massive commercialisation
and ‘development’ relying on the present totally inadequate
infrastructure. Whoever it be who has this city at his mercy needs to get
his priorities lined up in the right direction.
Who was it who exhorted us to ‘never despair’? E-mail:
arfc@cyber.net.pk
(Daily
Dawn August 27, 2006)
Citizens
to legally fight DHA plans to sell beach
KARACHI:
Non-government organizations (NGOs), trade unions and political parties have
joined hands to fight the privatization of Karachi's beaches with a legal,
signature and media campaign.
These
groups met Wednesday for a discussion forum on 'Clifton Beach and Sea View:
Proposed plans and their impact' at the Urban Resource Centre (URC) head
office with senior urban planner and URC chairman Arif Hasan in chair. The
main concern was the multi-billion dollar projects that will stretch over 14
kilometres of Clifton beach for commercial and residential construction that
could effectively shut off these areas for the general public.
The
URC, Aurat Foundation, Orangi Pilot Project, Church World Services, Edhi
Welfare Foundation, Pakistan People Party, People Labour Bureau KESC were
some of the organizations that have backed this cause in addition to
lawyers, professors, doctors and students of Karachi and NED universities.
A
15-member action committee was formed to conduct the campaign and will meet
next week to implement decisions made at the meeting.
Arif
Hasan talked about the negative impact of the $1.5 billion Water Front
Development Project, which was announced by the Defence Housing Authority (DHA).
After
it is ready, the public will not have access to the beaches of the city, he
said. In the past, DHA developed the Sea View Housing Project, which has
given rise to water pollution as untreated domestic waste is discharged into
the sea, he added.
"It
is an international law that any construction and development between roads
and beaches is not allowed.
The
governments of India, Bangkok, Sri Lanka have banned any development and
construction along beach sites. But in Pakistan these laws have been changed
by the mafia," said Hasan.
Participants
were concerned over the allotment of the beach in the name of development
and said that DHA had no right to take over recreational facilities.
"All
recreational spots are being grabbed by the land mafia in connivance with
the authorities," said Tahira Hussain, a lawyer. "According to the
Sindh Building Control Ordinance, beaches reserved for recreational proposes
are not mean to be sold for housing schemes."
She
suggested that society and political organizations should study every aspect
of the laws and fill a petition against the project. "We should use a
legal war and approach the courts," she urged.
Trade
union activist Latif Mughal said that the present government did not have a
clear policy for the general public. He proposed an awareness campaign to
mobilize public opinion against the privatization of the beaches.
He
said that the government authorities had their owns laws for the sale of
public resources to private parties for commercial purposes. But the public
should come forward to oppose this, he added.
The
Pakistan Peoples Party declared its support for the campaign against DHA,
which is selling beaches to the private parties. "The PPP will also
approach other political parties to raise this issue," said former
senator Taj Haider of the PPP. "The DHA's decision to turn this vital
ecological and recreational asset into private property for nascent
commercial exploitation needs to be carefully reviewed," he added as
the city already faces a shortage of recreational facilities.
"Beaches
cannot be allotted to private parties," he added.
(Daily
Times, Thursday, August 17, 2006)
DHA,
KPT projects along beach criticized
By
Bhagwandas
KARACHI, Sept 2: Speakers at a workshop criticised the civic agencies for
carrying out beach development projects, which they feared would deny access
to the poor masses to the seashore.
These views were expressed at a consultative workshop on “Karachi city:
searching for sustainable urban development paradigm” organised by Shehri
in collaboration with the Friedrich Naumann Foundation here on Saturday.
The speakers said that people should try to assert their ownership over the
city resources and various organisations managing these, as with better
monitoring the quality of life of the Karachiites would hopefully improve.
Speaking on the occasion, Arif Hasan, an expert in town planning, said that
the ecological concerns had been ignored by KPT while constructing its
installation as it did not leave any channel for the flow of water from
three main stormwater drains into the sea. This, he said, was a major cause
for the disastrous situation experienced by citizens during the recent rains
in the city.
He pointed out that the DHA had acquired a 14-km-long strip of land along
the beach in the name of ‘development’, adding: “If this process
continues, then less citizens will have access to beaches as construction
would be carried out all along the beach.”
He deplored the authorities for evaluating plans for the elite only, instead
of the majority, which belonged to middle and lower classes and formed more
than 70 per cent of the population.
He noted that a large number of Karachiites lived in katchi abadis or slums,
and argued that even in the Far East, governments would chalk out plans for
housing, development, recreation, etc., for the under-privileged class which
lacked basic amenities of life.
He said that in this city, millions of tons of effluent were being flushed
and dumped into the sea, adding to the miseries of fishermen communities
living in the areas along Korangi Creek for centuries.
Other speakers said that actions such as cellphone or purse snatching
provoked resistance but illegal allotment of amenity plots in the city went
unnoticed. It was due to fact that in the case of purse etc, there was a
sense of proprietorship, while in case of amenity plots one did not feel
that they belonged to the residents of the city, so nobody raised any hue
and cry and the plunder continued, it was pointed out.
They said that a new coastal development plan was being finalised owing to
which almost 80 per cent of the beach, which was a national resource and
nobody could restrict anybody’s entry to it, would become private and out
of bounds for the common people.
One of the speakers said that some time back the DHA while developing the
beach at Seaview Township removed the vendors and others selling low cost
edibles, snake charmers, jugglers, and others and the low income group
people stopped going there as majority of the families visiting that beach
could not afford to buy the expensive food items being sold at the stalls,
and that beach became out of the reach of the poor.
Similarly now a huge park is being developed at the Clifton beach by the
city government and under a similar exercise people selling low cost food
items, etc are being shifted, and after some time this beach will also be
out of the reach of the masses.
He said that there were over 150 stalls selling goods made from sea shells
for over a century, but now they had been evicted and these people were now
selling their goods to shops set up in nearby buildings and their earnings
had also declined. All this is going on, but nobody is coming up and raising
the issue to protect the right to access the beaches of the poor people, he
added.
Another speaker said that many nullahs that used to drain rainwater from the
city had been encroached upon and some of these had even been allotted
decreasing their capacity to drain the rainwater and during the recent
rains, which were just three inches, many portions of the city remained
inundated for many days even after the rains had stopped.
They said that owing to the greed of the people managing the city and
national resources vast patches of land had been reclaimed from the China
Creek, the back waters for the Karachi harbour, thus increasing the dredging
cost of the harbour channel. The DHA had also reclaimed land which had
affected the sea current.
One of the speakers said that the tendency to speculate in-land and housing
among the middle class people had taken roots owing to which, whenever a new
housing scheme was announced it was booked, but as a large number of the
people getting these plots or flats were speculators so on one hand many
plots and flats remained vacant, and on the other a large number of people
who wanted these could not afford to purchase such properties. This is due
to the speculation which inflates the prices out of the reach of the poor
masses, he added.
The speakers said that the recent rains brought to the fore the follies and
extreme shortcomings of the urban planning and development in the city and
the people suffered the consequences of overflowing sewers, flooded streets
and neighbourhoods, power outages and collapse of communication systems, and
most of the civic agencies, government or private, were engaged in a heated
blame game, accusing each other for being responsible for the unfolding
crisis.
They said that as the Northern Bypass was being constructed, so there was no
need left for Lyari Expressway, but it was being constructed and over
200,000 people had been uprooted from their ancestral homes in which their
families had been living for over 200 years.They said that respiratory tract
and eye diseases were increasing owing to the air pollution in the city due
to the vehicular smoke while the lead in the fuel was causing retardation
among people – women, children and elderly being more vulnerable.
They said over 300 million gallons of raw sewage, including untreated
industrial effluents, was entering the sea daily seriously affecting the
aquatic life and fragile marine ecosystem. They said that at least two new
power plants were coming up in the city without carrying out the mandatory
exercise of environmental impact assessment. The speakers were of the view
that unless the citizens realised that these were their resources and that
the organisations managing these resources were not properly handling these
resources and if they did not forge unity to resist against this plunder it
would continue to go on. They said that it was time to join hands and raise
their voice so that these resources were used wisely and the coming
generations could also benefit from these.
They said that earlier, the information regarding these projects etc was not
made available by the government departments, but now with the recently
announced access to information law hopefully the government organisations
would provide information, which was necessary to understand and become
aware of the effects of any project or new activity.
Arif Hassan, Tasneem Siddiqui, Roland D’Souza, Dr Noman Ahmad, Amber
Alibhai, Farhan Anwer, Hamid Maker, and others also spoke.
(By
Bhagwandas, Daily Dawn Karachi, September 03, 2006)
Urban
planners just concerned with financial benefits
KARACHI: Planning is being done by those who only are interested in
financial benefits; and when it comes to responsibility, none of the civic
authorities and agencies seem assured of their jurisdictions.
This was highlighted by Roland D’Souza, Electrical Engineer and
Chairperson, Shehri-CBE, at a consultative workshop on “Karachi City:
Searching for a Sustainable Urban Development Paradigm,” organised by
Shehri here on Saturday. The workshop was aimed at discussing among the
relevant stakeholders, the related issues and concerns and seek solutions
through a coordinated problem- solving approach.
“Authorities must not rush into projects without involving other civic
agencies as well as the general public”, said Amber Alibhai, General
Secretary, Shehri-CBE. Regardless of the area (it may be Nazimabad,
Cantonment or Port Qasim) any development that occurs within the city leaves
its effects on the other areas of the city, commented Amber. Preservation
and conservation of Karachi’s Natural and Built Environment is necessary
as numerous International as well as national visitors come to see the
metropolis.
We need to follow many worldwide examples where the private sector has
developed the cities with the help of their governments, she said. Four
separate case studies dealing with important urban development plans and
projects were presented by noted urban planning and development experts in
an effort to identify the relevant contributing policy and planning
dimensions of the urban development crisis in the city.
“A development project needs to be planned in such a way that the majority
would get benefits from that, and not only a particular group; whereas we
have always neglected the big part of our population (Katchi Abadis that is
about 70 percent) while planning development projects,” said Arif Hasan,
noted urban planner and Chairman, Urban Resource Centre (URC) who presented
a case study on the DHA Waterfront Development Project. Development, whether
it has already been done or is being planned along the coastline has no room
for the lower classes, most of whom had earned their livelihood from the
same place. Previously, the poor hawkers were forced by DHA to leave main
Sea View. All the monkey men, tea sellers and other hawkers then moved over
to the other side which started being called as Gharibon Ka Saahil. Later,
the City Government evicted them from there also for the Beach Park had to
be developed. Although it has been said by the City Government throughout
that this development has been done for the poor classes, not a single
family belonging to that class can afford the expensive entertainment they
are being forced to enjoy, Arif said. Be it the DHA, KPT or the City
Government, no one has planned development projects keeping Karachi’s
majority population in mind. “Eighty-two percent area of the open sea is
now inaccessible to the common man due to all the development that has been
carried out in between the sea and the road,” disclosed Hasan.
(The
News, September 03, 2006)
Ruffled
DHA seeks PRO for vexed beach project
KARACHI:
In a bid to alleviate organized public pressure against the increasingly
controversial multi-billion dollar Waterfront project, the Defence Housing
Authority (DHA) has decided to appoint a public representative, Daily Times
has learnt.
NGOs and professional bodies have protested against the DHA’s plans to
build the Waterfront Development Project comprising a commercial complex,
monumental tower, amusement park, five-star hotel, amphitheatre complex and
water sports facilities, along 14 kilometers of Clifton beach starting from
Old Casino to Golf Course. They argue that this project will effectively
block off access to prime recreational beach land for the public. They
contend that it is against international laws for any construction along
this type of land which the public have a right to freely access.
According
to sources, the DHA administration has asked the Defence Association
Coordination Committee (DACC), a Defence-based CBO, to gave the names of two
representatives who could make suggestions on the issue of the public’s
access along Clifton beach after the construction of the Waterfront
Development Project. For example, according to page 4 of the DHA master plan
for the project, “the private dwellings of the residents extend up to the
beach, which therefore is their private space”. The residential complex is
spread over 10 acres of land.
“A DACC delegation met the DHA administrator who asked us to submit the
names of public representatives, who can represent the problems and
grievances of the public,” said Aziz Suharwardy, general secretary, DACC,
while talking to Daily Times.
He said that these public representatives would help defuse the tension
between the NGOs and DHA over the $1.5 billion project. DACC has submitted
the names of the public representatives, he added.
According to DHA officials, the DHA Governing Body also discussed the issue
of access for the general public and reiterated its “confidence” in the
efficacy of the project, which envisages the provision of free and
uninhibited accessibility to 80 percent of prime beachfront area to the
general public in its “improved yet pristine form”. The project would
turn Clifton beach into an attractive recreational and entertainment resort
free of any charge, officials claimed.
|