Home

Current Issues

History of Karachi

Karachi Master Plans

Economy

Land Use

Housing

Evictions

Basic Urban Services

Transport and Traffic 

Management

Law & Order Situation

Education

Health

Environment

Karachi Census

Karachi City Maps

About URC Karachi

Some Important Links

URC Website Index

Contact Us

 



       

JUNE 2008

 

 

ISSUES:

 

 

 

 

 

Saddar, Lea Market pay Rs25m in extortion money every month

 

Millions of rupees change hands in Karachi everyday in the form of “bhatta” or protection money. The beneficiaries include all sorts of people, from ordinary police constables to officials sitting at the top echelons of power, while the payment is made by hawkers, shopkeepers, motorists, traders, industrialists, land grabbers, and the like.


According to a survey conducted by the Urban Resource Centre (URC), hawkers at the Saddar and Lea Market area pay Rs25 million per month as bhatta. The informal sector is in fact a constant and lucrative source of illegal earnings.


“Bhatta or protection money is collected by one of the vendors every day and then handed over to employees of traffic police, the [now defunct] Karachi Metropolitan Corporation’s land department, and area Station House Officer (SHO),” a police official told The News requesting anonymity. He says “bhatta” is also collected by the employees of the City District Government Karachi (CDGK) and Karachi Electric Supply Corporation.


Shopkeepers have to suffer immensely if they did not pay “bhatta” to the police.


“The entire attention of the Preedy police is focused on collecting “bhatta” from vendors. Police mobiles are busy in collecting money between 5pm to 9pm and this is the most opportune time for robbers to loot the people,” says Mairaj Ahmed Khan, general secretary, Zargram Welfare Association. He says failure to pay “bhatta” results in high repercussions and the police instead of investigating robberies and apprehending them, harass jewelers.


In a letter addressed to IG Sindh, Dr Shoab Suddle, the Association points out that not a single robber has been arrested nor looted goods were recovered which were committed in Saddar jewelry shops and workshops between 2006 and 2008 despite the fact that the First Information Report (FIR) was lodged at the Preedy police station after every robbery.


“Instead of apprehending the robbers, police very often ask odd questions such as why the jewellery was not insured, why gold in such a huge quantity was kept at workshops and the police allege that we were lodging fake FIRs,” Khan says.


Even hawkers who have authorised businesses are made to suffer.


“We have 735 newspaper stalls in the city approved by the CDGK and we have NOCs from the City Nazim but we too have to suffer when kiosks are removed by the CDGK in connivance with the police,” says Iqbal Loon, President Anjuman Imdadia Akhbar Farooshaan Karachi.


Interestingly, while protection money is paid to the police by hawkers, there is a well organized “bhatta” system prevailing in the police department itself and even beyond.


“There are more than 100 police stations in Karachi and police stations at Gadap, Malir, Memon Goth, Surjani Town, Manghopir, Ibrahim Haidery, Sachal, Korangi, Mochko, Kalri, Baghdadi, Kalakot, Chakiwara, Boat Basin, Bin Qasim and Shah Latif Town are the most lucrative,” says a police official on condition of anonymity. He says in the jurisdiction of some police stations drug mafia is active and it pays handsome “bhatta” to the respective police stations. Then in areas, such as Gadap, the “reti bajri” mafia pays “bhatta” to the respective police stations. Deadly drugs such as heroin and deadly arms such as Kalashnikovs are brought to the city through the Super Highway and drug barons and gangsters pay a handsome “bhatta” to the respective police stations.


Police stations are divided in accordance with the illegal money they generate and police officials are posted there after paying a huge sum of money to senior officials.

“The posting of a Station House Officer (SHO) at a lucrative police station costs Rs300,000 to Rs500,000 while a Town Police Officer (TPO) has to pay more than Rs1 million to get a nice posting,” police sources said.


The sources said the modus operandi until the recent past was that the home minister would ask the IG police to depute a particular police officer at a lucrative police station who in turn would ask the DIG to issue a requisition. Most of the “bhatta” money in turn would go in the coffers of top officials. Obviously, after paying a handsome bribe, police officials resort to extortion or “bhatta” collection to compensate their investment.


“Bhatta” is collected by what in the police parlance called “beaters” who collect money from hawkers, shopkeepers, traders, industrialists and land grabbers etc and it is then distributed among the top officials and the subordinates. In return, they are allowed to function smoothly. The sources said that two senior police officials collect the “bhatta” money and then distribute from the top to bottom.


Police stations at the suburbs of the city are more lucrative because huge sums of money are involved in land disputes and land grabbing.


Similarly, “reti bajri” mafia that has virtually killed the Malir River pay a huge amount to police for lifting sand and gravel from the Malir and Gadap area. According to Arif Hasan “60 billion cubic feet of sand and gravel has been drained from the river so far”.


The informal sector is ready to pay a certain fee to the government if it is not harassed and coerced by government officials. The informal sector offers immense job opportunities to the poor and could be a good source of revenue.

(By Shahid Husain, The News-13, 15/06/2008)

 

 

 

 

An electrifying transport solution

 

Besides poverty and squalor, what all South Asian cities have in common is a highly congested, heavily polluted, chaotic and unsafe transportation system. Poor urban transport is lowering the quality of life in at least three ways, besides contributing massively to climate change—the gravest threat humanity faces today.


First, traffic congestion means that people waste long periods of time in commuting, typically in unpleasant or nerve-wracking conditions marked by fierce rivalry for road-space. In many cities, commuting time has doubled over the past decade. Second, air pollution is causing grievous health damage, including respiratory problems and psychological stress. Third, transport expenses are rising, leading to cuts in spending on other necessities of life.


All these problems are getting aggravated as cars and two-wheelers proliferate in our cities, driven by rampant middle class consumerism and by policies which promote and subsidise them. In recent years, private vehicle production has risen in South Asia at rates much higher than GDP growth, typically 10 percent-plus. In India, car production has doubled over 5 years. Mid-sized—and more polluting—sedans are replacing small cars. Automobile emissions of suspended particulate matter (SPM), and oxides of nitrogen and sulphur, account for 60 percent-plus of the air-pollution load in our cities. Fine particulates contain some 40 known carcinogens. It’s estimated that a representative Delhi household would annually earn a benefit Rs 19,870 and in Kolkata Rs84,355 from reduced emissions of particulates. This translates into hundreds of billions for India alone!


Yet thanks to automobilisation, 57 per cent of all monitored Indian cities now record “critical” SPM levels, exceeding one-and-a-half times the permissible standard. India’s top 10 “hotspots” include small cities like Raipur, Kanpur, Alwar and Indore, but no metropolises.


The entry of the Tatas’ Nano will make things worse although its price is unlikely to remain at the “magical” Rs 1 lakh for long. It’s unlikely that the Nano can meet, without a hefty price rise, the Euro-IV emission norms which take effect in India in 2010. In any case, its sheer numbers, and those of other models on the way, will cause more pollution and congestion. Yet, shamefully, India has just lowered excise duties on small cars. This policy direction must be urgently reversed. We must promote public transport, and discourage private vehicles. Private transport means resource waste, and iniquitous use of road-space. In our cities, cars and two-wheelers hog 60 to 80 per cent of road-space, but only deliver 15 to 20 per cent of passenger trips. Buses occupy under 20 per cent of road-space, yet account for up to 60 per cent of trips.


Cars demand high maintenance, repairs and parking space. They usually occupy prime space—even when unused. Studies show that if owners were made to pay the economic rent for parking, many would stop using cars. At Mumbai’s Nariman Point, the true annual market price of parking-space for a car would exceed its cost 10 times over!

Runaway private transport growth must be curbed through higher taxation—current rates are unacceptably low—, stiff parking fees, Singapore-style bans on use of odd- and even-numbered cars, carpools, and extensive pedestrians-only zones.


Above all, we must promote efficient, affordable, non-polluting public transport, and bicycles. If Paris can have 200 km of bicycle paths, so can Delhi, Karachi or Dhaka. Bus Rapid Transit, with dedicated bus-lanes, is a worthy idea, and is being pursued in many European cities. Regrettably, Delhi’s BRT was poorly planned and implemented, without public education. It was all but sabotaged by an elite-driven media campaign. But we all need well-planned BRTs.


Electricity-powered transportation has a special place in any rational urban transport system, including Metro rail, trams and trolley-buses drawing power from overhead lines. Electric transport is non-polluting and noiseless.


We shouldn’t unthinkingly promote Metros. They cost 10 times more than BRTs and require heavy use (20,000 to 40,000 passenger-trips per hour per line) to pay for themselves. Most of our cities don’t have that commuting pattern.


Today’s phenomenal, yet subsidised, petroleum prices make electric vehicles (EVs) especially attractive. Insofar as we permit (limited) private transport, battery-operated cars/2-wheelers are especially relevant. They cost only about one-tenth as much to run as petrol-driven vehicles. EVs also encourage reduced dependence on fossil fuels, and frugal use of space and materials.


I’ve used an electric car—the Indian-made Reva, the world’s largest-selling purely-electric car—for more than three years. I find it almost as easy to drive/maintain as a bicycle. EVs are extremely simple and don’t have complex systems like fuel pumping, injection/mixing, electric synchronisation, gearbox-based transmission, and pollution- and noise-control mechanisms. Their battery-driven motor sits on the axle and transmits power directly via traction. The gear-free driving is pure pleasure.


I have had only one problem with the Reva, necessitating a shock-absorber change. EVs have a carbon footprint—from manufacture and assembly of components, and consumption of materials, to final waste disposal. But 80 per cent of the life-cycle pollution from petrol/diesel vehicles is caused during their running. Here, EVs score decisively.


Admittedly, EVs aren’t easily amenable, at today’s battery technology, to use in large-scale public transportation. They have a limited range, typically 60 to 130 km, depending on battery design. They need frequent recharging: typically, two to six hours a day, for three to five days a week.


EVs aren’t spacious “family vehicles”. Most existing electric cars can seat two adults and two children comfortably. (The Reva can pull four adults in cramped conditions.) With some planning of one’s trip, and proper charging, one can comfortably negotiate a city with an EV.


Personally, I have never been stuck with a dead battery even while driving all the way to the international airport from Central Delhi and back.


Driving an EV can transform one’s experience of our roads as sites of tension, cut-throat competition, mouthing of abuse and display of rage.


There is, then, a strong case for public support for EVs. Besides launching trolley-buses and reviving/strengthening trams, this can take three forms. First, our governments should offer EVs price subsidies and rebates in VAT, road taxes, free parking facilities, etc.


Many European Union governments do so. EVs enjoy free parking in London, besides 100 per cent depreciation in the first year. They pay no congestion charge (GBP 8 a day) in Central London. Apart from price subsidies, France mandates that 20 per cent of all new cars in public fleets must be electric. In Italy, EVs enjoy a 30 per cent price rebate, free parking and road-tax exemptions. In Japan, EVs get handsome tax support, besides ¥20 billion funding for battery development.


Thus, ironically, there are more Revas running in London than in Bangalore, where they’re made. The Delhi government has just announced a rebate of 29.5 per cent on EVs. Other Indian states—and provinces in our region—should emulate it.


Second, our governments must initiate programmes for developing lightweight, high-power batteries (e.g. lithium-ion), preferably in a collaborative South Asian mode. Most EVs use lead-acid batteries, whose basic design is more than 100 years old. This must change.


Third, governments must create an infrastructure in the form of free charging-points in city centres and major car-parks, which will greatly enhance the range of EVs and make them considerably more attractive and competitive with small petrol-driven cars.

(By Praful Bidwai, The News-6, 30/06/2008)

 

 

 

 

It’s not only the Kunda system that is the problem...

 

Massive power theft across the city by industrial and upscale residential consumers has created an off the book economy thriving at the cost of a 20-plus-per cent power distribution loss to the Karachi Electric Supply Company (KESC). This translates into the power utility’s account being deprived of roughly Rs25 billion in revenue against power units consumed, claimed sources.


According to the KESC management, for last 11 months the power utility has been suffering from an accumulative transmission and distribution loss of about 30 to 34 per cent, of which only 12 to 13 per cent can be attributed to technical loss. It shows that 18-20 per cent of the power is being siphoned off. Officially, the KESC administration acknowledges that 12-13 per cent out of the cumulative ‘25-27 per cent’ electricity being lost is due to technical reasons. Tanzeem Hussain Naqvi, the executive director of KESC’s business operation and distribution, attributed the rest of the non-technical loss to power theft. However, the ‘rest’ is around 20 per cent and not just 15-16 per cent as the KESC officially claims.


According to international standards, say critics, the transmission and distribution loss of a power utility must not exceed five to six per cent. In the KESC’s case, this figure has been over 100 per cent higher. “And that abnormal technical loss for KESC keeps going up,” says a KESC source.


When asked about the reason behind the excessive technical loss, Naqvi, who once had served KESC as its chairman, cites an ‘overloaded system’ as the main culprit. Acknowledging that a five to six per cent loss was the international standard, he maintained that the menace of power theft could not be wiped out.


Describing the KESC’s measures to address the issue, Naqvi said that the KESC, during the last year, had increased the total units of power sold to consumers by eight per cent. This shows that the KESC has minimized the technical losses.


Similarly, the power utility also improved its power generation by 2.1 per cent of the total units generated. “Ideal condition is almost next to impossible,” Naqvi said. “We can not put an end to it but certainly we can strive to curtail the losses.”


And who’s responsible for the power theft? According to the KESC, registered consumers have been employing ever-evolving techniques to utilize a maximum quantity of electricity while being billed for a minimum amount, which is then dutifully paid. “Indeed it’s the legitimate consumer who steals electricity,” Naqvi agreed. The KESC believes that commercial consumers followed by residential and then industrial consumers are stealing almost a quarter of what the power generating units produce for distribution. Independent sources with intimate knowledge of the KESC’s functioning blame the industries and agricultural farming for stealing away the major chunk of a total of power theft.


“Farmers in Malir and Gadap Towns run 30-horse power motors to get water from the tube wells and they are for sure running their show with the out-of-the-way help extended by the (KESC) staff, who facilitate such a brazen power theft with all-out technical support,” commented a power auditor, who has been surveying the area for the power utility.


Recently, a KESC staffer was arrested for allegedly running a plastic factory in Baldia Town using 45 illegally-acquired kilowatts, which, according to the raiding party, was sufficient to cater to the needs of at least 50 houses. “This is a perfect example of having an off the book economy being run at the cost of compromising the city of lights,” commented another source, privy to the case.


Everybody agrees with the idea of containing the losses that come under the head of power theft to not only make the power company profitable but also to turn it into an efficient service provider for its over two million consumers. That said, how to go after the ‘power thieves’ is a question nobody seems coming up with a plausible fix for. The experiment, therefore, is on.


The KESC has already started replacing its old copper distribution wire with aerial bundle cable in many parts of the city making it virtually impossible for any one to steal electricity from the consumer distribution lines. Similarly, the management has introduced new porcelain connector, which deters Kunda connections.


However, this initiative was taken in downtrodden localities such as the seven colonies of Orangi Town, Asia’s largest slum, instead of the upscale residential and commercial neighbourhoods such as Defence, where, according to the KESC Shareholders Association, the margin of stealing electricity is always higher than other middle-class localities.


“We have analysed this paradox. After finding out the total number of consumers in Defence and their total billing, we got a strange sum [of] Rs500 in hand as the average bill paid by each house,” Choudhary Mazhar Ali, secretary of the KESC Shareholders Association (KSA) told The News while exclaiming as to who could believe this position. According to the KSA, industries followed by upscale residential areas and commercial and agricultural consumers are the top three ‘power thieves’ whereas the Kunda system in middle-class neighbourhoods siphon off hardly one per cent of the power supplied to the consumer. “One per cent power theft means financial loss of about Rs1 billion to the KESC,” Mazhar Ali added. The KESC sources said that Shahid Hamid, the slain head of the utility, had a proposal of dividing the city into 26 zones installing bulk head metres at each zone’s transforming entry to be able to know exactly what was supplied and what was billed. “This did not happen in letter and spirit,” said a power auditor. “The widespread power theft goes on in connivance with the KESC staff.” Interestingly, the KESC, incorporated in 1913, has its own KESC police with a police station to have a check on power theft. However, many critics deemed it a bargaining agent between defaulters and the KESC rather than a solid actor against electricity stealers to book them for violating and depriving the KESC its due revenue.


The KESC has been mustering 1,800 to 2,000 megawatts electricity from its power generation units while its demand has grown to range between 2,400 to 2,500 megawatts thus leaving the power utility struggling with a shortfall of 400 to 500 megawatts. “This is why you see the KESC announcing shut down notices time and again specially during the summer season. “

(By Asadullah, The News-13, 30/06/2008)

 

 

 

 

 

Is it transparent now?

 

THE new government has made the defence budget relatively transparent. The new defence budget now discloses expenditure on personnel, operations and assets. It also contains service-wise breakup. Although the disclosure is still not perfect and a lot of people expect more details, the availability of some information as compared to the one-line budget of the past is an essential first step. It shows that the new military leadership had realised that it could not improve the organisation’s image without making some basic concessions including relative transparency of its spending. How far the appetite for greater information will be satisfied will depend on this — and the successive — government’s ability to capitalise upon this opportunity to expand its power vis-à-vis the armed forces.


Broadly speaking, there are two patterns of transparency in military expenditure. The first relates to the Nato definition of defence spending which clearly specifies that it would include all activities, even those in the civilian sector and by para-military forces, which are designed to strengthen the military’s capability.


The Nato classification includes pension, defence industry, special projects and all other defence related spending.


The other pattern relates to the Indian definition of the defence budget that provides certain amount of details but does not meet the Nato definition. The Indian budget gives breakdowns for the three services and also figures of annual capital expenditure versus operations spending. Since there is no hard and fast rule about what each country will reveal, Pakistan seems to have followed the latter approach. This pattern represents the via media between civilian demand for greater information and the military’s sensitivity for some amount of secrecy. It could be argued that it is not impossible to follow the US and British pattern of disclosure of defence estimates, but given the colonial nature of the military institution, the figures which have been provided now are better than the complete opacity of the past. This transparency is a historic milestone on, hopefully, what will turn out to be a road to greater transparency and better civilian control of the defence sector. Improved civilian authority over the armed forces is a corollary of greater transparency and vice versa.


A more confident civilian government means the one which makes the military and the country at large confident of its ability to deliver and govern the state. In Pakistan’s historical context, the military is a political force to reckon with and it would have to be convinced of the ability of the political dispensation to govern the country to cooperate more. A glance at the recently released budgetary figure of Rs295.306bn shows that the armed forces are spending 34 per cent on personnel, 28 per cent on operations, 4.1 per cent on travel, 29.7 percent on physical assets (meaning weapons), 8.7 per cent on civil works and 23.9 per cent goes on general expenditure. The service-wise breakdown is 43 per cent is the army’s share, 24 per cent is for the air force, and 9.8 per cent for the navy and 22.5 per cent goes to inter-services and defence production institutions. The teeth-to-tail ratio appears negative.


The defence budget does not include approximately Rs45bn in military pensions nor does it necessarily disclose off-budget financing. There are definitional issues as well such as where to classify retired military personnel that continue to work in civilian departments whose pay and personnel cost is not charged to the defence budget. Then there are other expenses incurred by the civilian local governments on behalf of military establishments or in cantonment areas which does not show up as part of military expenditure. One could go on and on with details of where the lines between military and civilian spending are fuzzy. Tabulating all such figures we could reach a total of Rs350-360bn. This does not mention the spending on the nuclear programme, not all of which can be found in this more transparent defence budgetary figure.


But let’s not complain about the current level of transparency. The greater problem is with the other claim regarding the possible reduction of defence spending which cannot happen due to the following reasons. First, the current configuration of the military does not allow for a substantial reduction of the military’s long-term liabilities such as personnel cost. A noticeable reduction can happen in two situations: (a) a unilateral decision by Pakistan (within a regional arms control framework) to disarm and (b) change the structure of the military by making it less labour intensive and more capital intensive. These are serious political decisions which cannot be taken until the government is stable and the Defence Cabinet Committee of the Parliament (DCC) is strong enough to make such decisions.


Second, currently the DCC depends upon the military for input. The 22 parliamentary committees, which were formed during the 1970s as a result of ‘higher defence re-organisation’ of the Bhutto days, do not have a system whereby independent opinion is sought to corroborate the information provided by the military intelligence services and the service headquarters. For example, during the 1980s, the air and naval headquarters had played up external threat to force the government to allow the services to buy a certain category of French missiles. Since the government then did not have an alternative source of information, it gave in to the demands. The present parliament could either encourage a system of lobbying by various stakeholders as happens in the US or allow for the streamlining of the defence bureaucracy for better information.


This brings me to the third issue of the lack of capacity of the existing Ministry of Defence (MoD). Over the years, the MoD has become impotent due to its militarisation and lack of expertise. The MoD should be manned by experts who know management of defence. This means training of bureaucrats and bringing in outside experts. The Pakistani civilian bureaucrats, especially of the MoD, are no comparison to their more powerful counterparts in India. The appointment of military officers in key positions in the ministry has completely weakened the ability of the civilian bureaucrats to deliver. An under-capacitated MoD bureaucracy cannot reduce the wastage in the defence budget which is estimated to be over 20 per cent. This means that we cannot have reduction in the short or medium terms.


Fourth, accountability is a crucial factor. There are structural flaws in the military’s accounting and auditing system which currently encourages wastage.


Finally, given the military’s existing plans to carry out military modernisation, it does not seem that immediate defence burden will reduce substantially in the short to medium term. Thus, a short-term suggestion one could offer the existing parliament is to hold a conference of experts on military expenditure and defence accountability in which international and national experts could apprise the government about how to go about its business of dealing with the defence burden. If the cat is to be belled, let it be done properly.

(By Ayesha Siddiqa, Dawn-7, 20/06/2008)

 

 

 

 

Keti Bunder facing sea intrusion

 

About 28,000 people of Keti Bunder may suffer a major displacement in the next 10 years as the sea is fast eroding their land. With the construction of dams and barrages upstream and stoppage of water downstream, the pace of sea intrusion has increased over the decades. The area has become highly vulnerable to cyclones and tsunamis as mangroves that serve as natural barriers to these calamities are being uprooted at an alarming rate. These facts were highlighted during a tour of journalists to the deltoid region. The visit was organised by World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Karachi.

 

Deprived of basic facilities such as a water supply and proper sanitation, and with no infrastructure for health and education, the impoverished fishermen bitterly spoke of the government’s continued indifference and the neglect of society at large during the journalists’ visit to the area. “Every monsoon, fishermen suffer damages due to rising sea tides. However, there was no help ever from any official quarters. Last week, most fishermen in the affected creek areas spent the night in boats as many houses were inundated in front of their eyes and their precious belongings were lost,” said Mohammad Siddique, who with many others had shifted to the inland area of Babu Dablu village near the Keti Bunder Town from Chaan and Hajamro creeks a few years ago. Though the coastal area faces a number of problems, the foremost is the lack of drinking water supply. Keti Bunder has no direct line for drinking water while official work on the same continues at a snail’s pace. Water is brought in through tankers and is sold for Rs1,000 to Rs2,000 a trip. Landlords buy water, some store it in their tanks, which is then supplied to inland and creek areas. Four to five gallons of water is sold at Rs25 to R30.

 

Middlemen, who give credit to fishermen on interest and then continue to exploit them for generations, are also supported by landlords. “The Shirazis and Malkanis have established their hegemony in coastal areas and are exploiting marine resources as well as poor fishermen. They claim that the creeks are their property and extort money from fishing people,” said a fisherman.


Over 90 per cent of the population of Keti Bunder is illiterate and lives well below the poverty line. Sea intrusion, which has become faster in recent decades, has swallowed up 28 dehs (settlements) out of the 42 and the population has been displaced thrice. Abject poverty, disease and government apathy have left the people hopeless and almost the entire population has been hooked to gutka. Even women and children are not free of the addiction. Some non-government organisations are doing their bit, but that is too little to improve the lives of thousands of people.


“What is there to live for? Gutka is a big relief. It helps us to get rid of hunger, pain and the agony and weakness of illness,” said another fisherman. About the exploitative tactics of the middlemen, he said these people provided poor fishermen with loans for meeting travel expenses.


“Things were not that bad when I was young. We used to have a good catch and lived a healthier life. Now, it’s difficult even to feed children during off season,” said Mohammad Hasan, an old man with poor health and eyesight. “My eye problem has spread to such an extent that I can’t even see now. I went to a doctor in Gharo, but I couldn’t continue the treatment since I didn’t have money. I spend my entire day sitting on the chair listening to surrounding voices and, at times, reminiscing bygone days.”


Once a thriving land

More than half a century ago, when the atrocities of the landlords were not so rampant and dams had not been built upstream, Keti Bunder was a hub of international trade activities in Sindh. The once beautiful flourishing deltoid area comprised vast agriculture lands brimming with marine resources. Ships from as far as Europe used to anchor here. Its main produces were Sindh ganja (red rice), coal, desi ghee, butter and wood. It was so rich that once its municipality gave a loan to the Karachi municipality and records of 1934-35 show that local traders had their commission agents in Muscat. The area was ideal for the production of banana, coconut, melon and watermelon. Today, the picture of a grave man-made tragedy stands like an unfortunate princess who despite losing her beauty, youth and affluence in a mutiny, still faces threats to her existence as the giant sea is gradually eating her up. According to some estimates, Keti Bunder has lost 113,900 acres to the sea and slowly, like other parts of Badin and Thatta districts, is losing more area with time. According to a WWF document: “Due to very low discharge of the Indus and lack of flooding, the palla fish has been unable to migrate upstream for breeding and hence its stocks have depleted at an alarming pace during the last 15 years. It was reported that as the single large species of fish comprising 70 per cent of the total catch in the past. At present, it hardly constitutes 15 per cent of the total catch.”

 

Though vegetable, betel leaf, sugarcane, wheat and fruits are still grown in the inland areas, 80 per cent of the population is engaged in fishing. Earlier, only 20 per cent were involved in fishing. Still about 39 plant and 69 bird species are found in the deltoid region while Keti Bunder North and South is a wildlife sanctuary, mainly for water birds.


Mangroves depletion

During a presentation, Zahid Jalbani, WWF representative at Keti Bunder, said that mangroves were disappearing at a faster rate in the Keti Bunder area. Mangroves, which grew in a combination of saline and freshwater, only existed in Thatta and Karachi districts in Sindh and only four species had now been left out of eight.


“Though illegal cutting of mangroves and grazing are also contributing to the depleting mangrove cover, the reduced flow of freshwater is the major reason behind their destruction. The pace of devastation has dramatically increased over the time which is alarming. Obviously, their destruction is directly linked to the low catch of fish and shrimps. At least 10 MAF of freshwater downstream the Kotri barrage is needed to rehabilitate the region.” If the situation persisted, he said, the entire biodiversity of the area would be lost, besides leading to serious social and economic repercussions. “Not only that the area would be vulnerable to cyclones and tsunamis,” he said.


About the WWF intervention under the Indus for All Programme, Mr Jalbani said that a number of initiatives had been taken with community support. They included setting up of five wind turbines in coastal and inland areas, mangrove plantation, uniting villagers under community-based organisations and provision of boats with water tanks that feed four villages. Medical camps and workshops for awareness-raising had also been held.

(By Faiza Ilyas, Dawn-19, 19/06/2008)