Home

Current Issues

History of Karachi

Karachi Master Plans

Economy

Land Use

Housing

Evictions

Basic Urban Services

Transport and Traffic 

Management

Law & Order Situation

Education

Health

Environment

Karachi Census

Karachi City Maps

About URC Karachi

Some Important Links

URC Website Index

Contact Us

 

LYARI EXPRESSWAY

 

 

 

 

Feb 24' 2004

 

Lyari Expressway

Probe into ‘massive corruption’ demanded

 

KARACHI: Taj Haider, Central Information Secretary, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) has called for a high-level probe into the "massive corruption" being carried out by those involved in the construction of Lyari Expressway.

 

"Just to hide its ineligibility and corruption, the government has started demolishing the settlements which are not a part of the Lyari river area," said Haider while talking to a big gathering of the Lyari Expressway affectees in Mianwali Colony, here the other day.

 

He said that in a span of just two years, the city government and the National Highway Authority had spent Rs8 billion on the project having an estimated cost of just Rs3 billion. He demanded review of the project map in line with the directive of the high court.

 

In a statement read out on the occasion, Ghinva Bhutto, Chairperson of PPP-Shaheed Bhutto, said she fully agreed to launching a "resistance movement" in case the demands of the affectees were not met. She said she would be the first one to face bulldozers.

 

Central Secretary General of National Workers Party Gen (Retd) Yousuf Masti Khan, leader of Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Maulana Waliullah, Baseer Naveed of Action Committee for Civic Problems, Fareed Ansari of Asif Zardari Release Committee and leaders of PPP-Shaheed Bhutto also addressed the gathering. They declared that they would resist the government moves aimed at demolishing the concrete and leased settlements. 

(Daily The News, 24/02/04)

 

 

Feb 21' 2004

Kuwait resumes funding for major projects

 

ISLAMABAD, Feb 20: The Kuwait Development Fund on Friday broke its five-year "interlude" in their funding activities in Pakistan by offering assistance for infrastructure projects in this country.

At the same time it has promised on behalf of the Kuwait government to assist in getting for Pakistan the dialogue partner status in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz and Kuwaiti Minister for Commerce and Industry Abdullah Abdul Rehman al-Taweel told a news conference here at the conclusion of the Joint Ministerial Commission (JMC) meeting that they had left behind a couple of years of 'lull' in their bilateral relations.

The KDF had discontinued funding projects in Pakistan after it developed serious differences with Islamabad on bilateral debt restructuring terms under debt re-profiling by the Paris Club in 1999.

The Kuwaiti minister said the Fund was back in business with Pakistan after the resolution of certain issues with the Pakistan government, and to begin with, it would fund Lyari Expressway project.

The Kuwait Development Fund was facing certain problems with the government of Pakistan which have been resolved and now it would fund projects in Pakistan on highly concessional terms, Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz said.

Rehman al-Taweel said in all some six projects were brought up by the Pakistan government and foremost priority was given to the Lyari project which "we have agreed to fund and modalities would be worked soon".

The Kuwaiti minister said Pakistan's private sector should consider Kuwait as a hub of economic activity in the Gulf region and consider it as a bridge to be used for reaching Iraq for a share in its reconstruction.

"As an ally of the US, Kuwait has got many projects going in Iraq and we urge Pakistani businessmen to take advantage of the situation, and if they like they can come independently or enter into joint ventures with Kuwaiti private sector, but transparency and fair business is the name of the game in Kuwait."

He said Kuwait would also plead for Pakistan's case, which is "our ally and a trusted friend in the GCC" to make Pakistan an active partner for trade and economic activity in the Gulf.

"We are increasing the trade in the GCC, and as we have done with India we would take Pakistan aboard as well and for the purpose I will talk to the secretary general of GCC," he said.

The minister said the Kuwait Development Fund was willing to come forward and act as active player in projects in Pakistan. "Currently, the Fund's portfolio is around $245 million for 12 projects in Pakistan and we would see that it expands now," he said, adding highways had been put in the priority list by Pakistan and if more projects in other sectors were put in this list that would also be taken care of.

Responding to a question regarding Kuwait's interest in the privatization of Pakistan State Oil, the visiting minister said that they had also discussed this and had also expressed interest in Pakistan's privatization programme, particularly in oil and communications sectors.

Rehman al-Taweel said both the governments should push the private sectors in their respective countries to interact and get involved in business activity in each others' country with the governments only facilitating and regulating them.

Shaukat Aziz appreciated the Kuwaiti government's interest in Pakistan, particularly through the Kuwait Development Fund and said that Pakistan offered a number of opportunities for investment for both the private and public sectors of Kuwait.

He said during the second Joint Economic Commission since its coming into being in 1999, the Kuwaiti minister had informed Islamabad that Kuwait would increase its investment in Pakistan in the areas of infrastructure, especially roads, power, water, telecommunications and the social sector.

Mr Aziz said: "We have sought cooperation from Kuwait to act as a bridge for getting a share for Pakistan's private sector in the reconstruction of Iraq." "On the labour front, we have informed Kuwait that human capital is major strength of Pakistan and Kuwait should encourage taking more workforce from Pakistan.

And we have asked for permission to open branch of a Pakistani bank in Kuwait that will help the workforce already working there to send their remittances through legal means," he said.

"Similarly, Kuwait has also been asked to open up bank here in Pakistan." Mr Aziz said Pakistan had submitted.

( Daily Dawn Karachi, 21/02/04)

 

 

Nov 16' 2003

Lyari Expressway update

Eminent politicians, NGOs invoke SHC’s writ jurisdiction

 

Eleven prominent political leaders and NGOs, while invoking writ jurisdiction of the Sindh High Court against the Lyari Expressway project, have termed it against land acquisition, environment, human rights and settlement laws.

 

"It is a typical example of intensive planning where a grandiose project is developed ignoring larger contextual realities, where physical results are more important than people and environment and where the megalomania of politicians and fantasy of planners is satisfied," says the petition, filed on behalf of Taj Haider of the Pakistan People’s Party, Sardar Sanaullah Zehir of the National Party, Sardar Abdul Rahim of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, Muhammad Amin Khattak of the Awami National Party, Yousaf Masti Khan of the National Workers’ Party, Abdul Kahlique Junejo of the Jiye Sindh Mahaz, Abdul Hayee of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Muhammad Younis of the Urban Resource Centre, Anees Haroon of the Aurat Foundation, Baseer Naveed of the Action Committee for Civic Problems and Arif Hasan of the Oranig Pilot Project. The petition, bearing number 1437 of 2003 is fixed for preliminary hearing before the bench headed by Justice Zahid Kurban Alvi.

 

It is first petition filed by NGOs jointly. Earlier, the occupants of land on both banks of the river had filed a number of petitions through which they had asserted their individual rights. In this petition the issue has been given a new life purely on human rights basis.

 

Umer Siyal and Tahira Hasan advocates have submitted that the petitioners are interested in preserving the natural and built environment of the city. They filed the petition on behalf of those who are poor, ignorant, or in an economically disadvantageous position. In order to resolve the traffic congestion problem of 12.5million people of this city, the Karachi Mater Plan (1975-1985) had proposed Northern Bypass and Southern Bypass. Southern Bypass, which envisaged joining of Mai Kolachi bypass to national highway through Defence society, was scrapped when highly powerful segment of the society opposed it on the pretext that the traffic noise on this road would disturb their peaceful living. The Northern Bypass was conceived in 1980 as a much-needed means of linking the Karachi port to Super Highway.

 

The purpose of this bypass was to redirect all port related traffic, which consisted of 20,000 heavy vehicles per day, to the superhighway. This project remained in files till 1986 when Lyari Expressway was proposed as its alternative. This proposal was strongly opposed by professionals, non-governmental organisations and Lyari community. After public hearings and discussions were held in 1995-96, the then senior provincial minister finally decided to scrap the proposal. In June 2000, however, the federal government decided to build both Northern Bypass and 16.5-kilometre-long Lyari Expressway. The estimated cost of Lyari Expressway is Rs7billion, while analysts believe that the actual cost would be three times the estimated cost.

 

The original 1995 plan of Lyari Expressway, it has been contended, envisaged widening of the river bed to 200 feet at Soharab Goth with gradual increase to 500 feet near Mauripur and construction of 50 feet roads on both banks which were to pass underneath the existing 12 bridges on the river. This plan, however, has been amended. Now, the bed would be widened to 800 feet and there would be 100-foot-wide roads on both banks, which would run over the existing bridges. Despite repeated requests of the affected people, NGOs, political parties and other concerned individuals and organisations, the amended plan of Lyari Expressway has not been made public.

 

At present there are approximately 0.2million Katchi Abadi dwellers on both sides of the Lyari River and all of them are being displaced by the respondent, National Highways Authority, which has been assigned the task of constructing the expressway. Besides, about 25,400 houses, 3,600 commercial units, 50 mosques, five churches, eight temples, 10 schools, 38 clinics, one hospital and 66 factories are being demolished to reclaim 1.8 million square yards of land worth Rs20billion to facilitate the construction of the mega project.

 

The project, in fact, is a humanitarian disaster, as it would render thousands of people homeless and jobless. The residents of this low and middle income colonies, a large number of whom are employed in the city’s recycling industry and as daily wage labours, have since been running from pillar to post, trying to find alternative accommodation for their families because as against the 25,400 houses being demolished, the government is giving Rs50,000 cash and an 80 square yards plot in Hawksbay to only 14,000 affected families.

 

The work on the project has been started without taking into consideration its environmental impact. According to section 12 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997, it is mandatory that before launching such project its environmental impact assessment is smutted to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA). No such assessment report was prepared in respect of Lyari Expressway. Besides, the project also runs contrary to the Istanbul Declaration of Human Settlements and the International Human Right Laws to which Pakistan is a signatory. The effect of the demolition and the acquisition of land in violation of law would render a large number of people homeless with no provision for resettlement, or compensation.

The state has usurped and confiscated the property of citizens instead of acquiring it thus has been guilty of violating the Constitution. The expressway is not displacing people from the riverbed only. More than 50 per cent of the affected people are those, whose houses and businesses came in alignment of this project.

(Daily The News Sunday November 16, 2003-)

 

 

 

 

Oct 15' 2003

Sindh High Court (SHC) orders government 

to redesign Lyari Expressway

 

The High Court of Sindh (SHC) on Tuesday 14th October 2003 directed the National Highway Authority (NHA), government of Sindh, and the City District Government of Karachi (CDGK) to review the design of the 16.5 kilometre long Lyari Expressway so as to minimise number of people to be affected by this project.

 

A bench comprising Justice Sabihuddin Ahmed and Justice Ali Aslam Jaferi passed this order while disposing of a number of identical petitions filed by more than 300 affectees of LEW. The writ jurisdiction of the court was originally invoked by more than 700 affectees through about 21 petitions but ten of them were rejected on the grounds the petitioners, more than 250 in number, had no valid lease documents. The bench had observed that these petitioners would be at liberty to accept the package announced by the City Government, Karachi City District, for the rehabilitation of the affectees of this mega-project.

 

The government had raised objections on the maintainability of the pleas of remaining petitioners, who held lease documents, on the grounds that no lease could be granted in the bed or on the bank of any river as per the law. These leases were granted illegally by some corrupt officials of the defunct KMC against whom legal action had been initiated.

 

The bench, however, overruled this objection of the respondents and held that holders of these leases were entitled to the price of the land at market rates and in accordance with law.

 

The court directed the respondent to resolve the dispute with individual petitioners who had raised construction as per approved plans or alternatively pay them prices of their lands as per market rates of the area where the properties to be acquired are located.

 

The bench observed that a large number of petitioners had already accepted the package offered by the government and vacated their properties and further delay in completion of this vital project would not only increase the burden on the national exchequer but also add to the inconvenience of the public at large.

 

The court held in its 41-page judgment that the petitioners were entitled to compensation only in respect of the land leased out to them and not on the structures raised over them.

 

During pendency of these petitions, the government had offered a package to these petitioners. The package said the petitioners who were in possession of genuine leases would be given compensation as per the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act i.e. according to the market rates of the property. It further said that if the payment made by a lessee against the land in his possession was in access to Rs50,000, the total amount paid by him would be refunded along with an 80 square yards plot.

 

In the case of multi-storey buildings, each floor would be taken to be individual family unit entitled to receive the same compensation of Rs50,000 plus an 80 square yards plot. However, compensation on multi-storey buildings would be paid on floor basis and to the physical occupants. However, majority of the petitioners had rejected the package after which the court had reserved its judgment which was announced on Tuesday. The bench observed that the project was of national importance which was being constructed in the public interest for which private property could always be acquired under the law. The lands in questions, it is worth mentioning, are located in PIB Colony, Liaquatabad, Old Sabzi Mandi, Sohrab Goth, Gulshan-e-Iqbal etc.

Advocates Fazal-e-Ghani, Showkat Shaikh, Muhammad Jameel, Ghulam Kadir Jatoi, M Ilyas Khan, Attaullah Khan, and others appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Former Advocate-General (AG), Sindh, Raja Qureshi, Additional AG Sulemen Habibullah, and present AG, Sindh Mansoor Khan, represented the Sindh Government; Syed Jameel Ahmed represented the KDA; Shahid Jameel represented the KBCA and while Manzoor Khan advocate represented the City Government.

 

(The News, 15/10/03 page 3)

 

 

 

 

Oct 09' 2003

Lyari Expressway Eviction update

 

Karachi City Government has resummed the demoltition operation of the settlements aound Lyari river. In last one week over 1500 houses were demolished.

These evictions are part of a larger demolishing operation in which government is planning to bulldoze over 25400 houses units to make way the for one of the most controversial raod project called "Lyari Expressway" . See a photo of current bulldozing operation below;

These forced evictions were started on 21st January 2002. Prior to recent bulldozings 5759 units (including 2384 commercial and 3375 Residential) were bulldozed to make way for this controversial project.

The struggle against forced evictions goes on. The communities are strongly opposing these demolitions. Most city planners, architects, NGOs and professionals firmly believe the city does not need this project.

 

 

 

June 04' 2003

Lyari Expressway likely to head for greater controversy

By Zabe Azkar Hussain

 

KARACHI: The much-criticised project of construction of the Lyari Expressway (LE) can stir up another controversy on the part of some 49 communities who, according to well-informed sources, are prepared to resist the construction without a "sound compensation".

Provincial Authorities, the sources said, had noted that the pending cases were causing delay in the construction of the LE. The legal fight on the part of the government, the meeting said should be further expedited and the Advocate- General, Sindh, could play his due role in advancing arguments before the High Court that was hearing all the cases (together). On the other hand, the sources highlighted the fact that political parties (almost all the major ones) had taken up the matter seriously and at a meeting (on May 30) set up a Resistance Committee (RC).

The RC, it is learnt, has now fixed June 9 to hold a meeting at the Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) House, when it would evolve a strategy to fight against the construction of the LE. Baseer Naveed, Taj Haider, Muhammad Hussain Mehnati, Habib Junaidi, Hafiz Taqqi, Ghinwa Bhutto, Sardar Raheem and other leaders of major political parties represent the RC and they are of the firm opinion that the construction would not be allowed by the citizens as their houses would be demolished without any worthwhile compensation.

On the other hand, well-informed sources said that the City Nazim, Naimatullah Khan, was also being approached by the influential political parties' leaders to review his approach towards the LE Construction. The City Nazim is regarded among the pleaders of the LE Construction. He on various occasions had said that a reasonable compensation amount (Rs 50,000) and a plot (80 square yards) would be given to those who were going to be affected.

However, those representing the communities argue that as many as 250,000 people would suffer due to the construction and they all were residing in leased areas. These people hail from well-to-do families and owned big plots, shops, and stores running profitable businesses. In the case of these people, the city government could not justify its action giving small plots and puny sums in the name of compensation. Hence, these people are not allowing the construction and some of them have filed cases.

The political parties that set up RC, it is learnt have decided to persuade the Chief Minister of Sindh and the Prime Minister for stopping the construction of LE. The parties have also decided not to talk to the Governor of Sindh, as according to them, he was taking least interest in heeding the grievances of the people who would suffer because of the construction. The sources revealed that the minorities' leaders were also among the critics of the LE construction as some churches and chapels could be demolished for the construction of LE.

(N-3, 04/06/03)

 

 

 

May 09' 2003

Lyari Expressway: Letter to Editor


This refers to Mr A. B. S. Jafri's article, published in your issue on May 4.


For the construction of the Lyari Expressway, the government is demolishing over 25,000 housing units which are home to more than 200,000 families. Most of these are outside the river-bed and have legal water and electricity connections. A large number of them are on leased land.

In addition, about 3,600 commercial enterprises are also being demolished. As these demolitions are being carried out without a proper rehabilitation plan, they will render tens of thousands of Karachiites homeless and jobless and adversely affect the schooling of over 20,000 young girls and boys. Apart from human and moral considerations, these demolitions are bound to increase social conflict and fragmentation, which our unfortunate city can ill afford.


We are not against development projects, but the Lyari Expressway in its present form is at best a controversial project. A number of Karachi's senior planners, relevant academics, NGOs and prominent citizens have opposed it and pointed out its inappropriateness and the harm that it will cause to the city, in general, and the environment and the citizens, in particular.


The Lyari Expressway will have 16 overhead bridges with four interchange flyovers on the total length of 16.5km. This will run over the embankments of the Lyari river with 100-foot-wide roads on each side. These proposed roads will demolish the leased and concrete structures, pucca houses, as well as the 150-year-old Hassan Aulia village, 250-year-old Ilyas Goth, 230-year-old Jangian Goth, 55-year-old PIB Colony, 50-year-old Liaquatabad A-1, B and C-1 areas, Mian Wali Colony, Gharib Nawaz Colony, Muslimabad and some other colonies.


Generally, a committee of experts from different backgrounds, institutions and interest groups examines the projects that are likely to have adverse effects or are controversial, at the conceptual stage. The committee makes the plans public, holds public hearings and invites objections and suggestions from interest groups, would-be victims and beneficiaries of the project.

On the basis of this process, a decision on solid planning considerations and political priorities is taken. This process has not been carried out for the Lyari Expressway. For Karachi this process is all the more important given the failure of so many mega projects planned for the city with great fanfare, and into which billions of rupees have been sunk.


The Land Acquisition Act 1894 was not followed at all, particularly in the process of land acquisition, resettlement of the affected people, surveys, appealing courts and appointment of collector for evictions.


In addition, according to section 12 of the Environment Protection Act 1997, this project should have had an environmental examination that has not been carried out. Also, the manner in which people are being evicted violates the UN Habitat Agenda (to which Pakistan is a signatory) and also the policy decision announced by the president on Jan 15, 2001, for regularization and upgradation of kutchi abadis.


Over 700 cases are pending in the Sindh High Court challenging the evictions of the leased houses. The city government has demolished till now over 3,000 houses and 2,200 commercial units. A 13-year-old child and a 40-year-old man died during the demolition. Four men and two women died of a heart attack on the spot during the demolition of their houses.


BASEER NAVEED

Chairman, Action Committee for Civic Problems, Karachi

(D-06, 09/05/03)

 

 

 

 

May 09' 2003

CJ asked to take suo moto notice of LEW irregularities

 

The Action Committee for Civil Problems (ACCP) has appealed to the Chief Justice Sindh High Court (SHC) to take suo moto notice of the alleged irregularities being committed by government functionaries in respect of Lyari Express Way (LEW).

 

In a letter to the CJ, the Chairman, ACCP, Baseer Naveed, said that on the initiative of the federal government, the National Highway Authority (NHA) had taken up construction of the LEW and the city district government had been assigned the task of resettlement of the affectees.

 

Work on the project should have been started after acquisition of the land. Under the land Acquisition Act of 1894 seven steps need to be taken for acquisition of land. The government should first notify the land within prescribed boundaries to be acquired.

 

Objectives of requisitioning should be fixed and resettlement plan approved. After these steps, the law requires that detailed survey of holdings within the demarcations plans should be conducted and rates of compensation notified.

 

At the last stage, the law requires the agencies concerned to judiciously dispose of appeals on rates of compensation. "It is with regret that we have to inform you that no such action has been taken by either the city district government or the government of Sindh. Besides, no land has been transferred to NHA for executing the work as yet. The working of NHA on land not owned by it by all canons of law and justice is illegal", the letter adds. In the end, the ACCP has appealed to the CJ to take suo moto notice of these irregularities which were adding to the sufferings of 250,000 affectees of the LEW.

(N-02, 09/05/03)

 

 

 

May 03' 2003

Govt urged to abandon Expressway project

 

Speakers at a workshop on Friday condemned the Lyari Expressway Project and contested the government's claim that it would ensure future development of the city.


The execution of the project would not only result in massive dislocation of the people living on the banks of the river, it would also result in extensive noise pollution and environmental degradation.


The workshop, which was organized by the PPP(SB) at 70 Clifton, was addressed by the party's co-chairperson Ms Ghinwa Bhutto, urban town-planner Arif Hasan, former administrator of the defunct KMC Fahimuzzaman, Professor Noman of NED University, Engineer Ismail Shoaib, Baseer Naveed, Tariq Aziz Hoat and others.


The speakers criticized the National Highway Authority for bypassing all rules of land acquisition and revising the project scheme without consulting the people. They were of the view that the "project was politically-motivated rather than development-oriented.

They said the basic objective was acquire more and precious land for commercial purpose. The speakers said the expressway would not only affect the people from the river-bed, more than 50 per cent of the affectees are those whose houses and businesses would come in the expressway alignment and who live above the flood-line.

Participating in the debate, Arif Hasan said he had opposed the project at the very outset as he firmly believed that it would not serve the development needs of the city as claimed by the government, rather it would prove disastrous for the city.


In support of his contention, he said the proposed project had never been a part of any development project of the city and was conceived without any public consultation.

He was of the view that its implementation would result in dislocation of those settled along the river-bed, but it would also cause massive destruction of property and commercial establishments.

 

Arif Hasan questioned why priority had been assigned to such an expensive project whereas the city needed funds for more urgent uplift projects.

 

He argued that in any case of shifting of the people from the river-bed, an expressway was not required. He said all that is required is to shift the population living below the flood-line.

He also did not agree that the building of the expressway would provide an unhampered and quick access to port traffic.


Terming the project anti-people, Prof Noman said the project seemed to be conceived to usurp more and more land for commercial purposes.


He vehemently condemned the role of the NHA for bypassing all state rules and regulations and institutions. Even the city government was not consulted at the planning stage and it was used at the implementing stage, he claimed.


He regretted that all the norms of a civilized society were being ignored by the NHA for execution of the project which clearly indicated that motive was not mere development, but acquisition of precious land in the name of progress.


Mr Fahimuzzaman, a former administrator of defunct KMC, gave a brief account of the project, saying that the project was conceived by his administration as an anti-flood project for channelizing the Lyari river to stop the recurrence of massive devastation caused by rains in 1977.


In this regard, a survey was also carried out by WAPDA in 1981 which suggested the channelization of the Lyari river. Originally, he said it was a road project. Under the plan, roads were to be built on both banks of the river with maximum dislocation of population.

Engineer Shoaib Ismail suggested suitable changes in the existing plan to avoid massive dislocation of people and loss of property.


The chairman of the Action committee for Civic Problems, Baseer Naveed, attacked the NHA for violating all rules and regulations, and said there were various defects in the resettlement plan.


Ms Ghinwa Bhutto said: "We are not against any infrastructure activity." However, she opined every development activity must be in the interest of the people. She said since the people are against the project, it must be dropped.


On this occasion, she urged the people to unitedly face the challenges being faced by society. The workshop was also addressed by Tariq Aziz Hoat, Haji Aslam and Inayat Husain.
(D-15, 03/05/2003)

 

 

May 01' 2003

Land allotment in Expressway project questioned

 

The Action Committee for Civic Problems has said the "survey list" regarding the people affected by the Lyari Expressway Project, also submitted to the UN fact-finding mission, is full of errors and not transparent.


At a press conference held here at the Karachi Press Club on Wednesday, the committee's chairman, Baseer Naveed, pointed out various ambiguities, claiming "the whole process of land allotment is questionable."


He produced a survey list of 600 affected people, saying that the list was without any marked survey number and in some cases there was no mention of house numbers and ID card number.


"It appears that the city government, the expressway resettlement project or the revenue department have not carried out any survey and it has been prepared in haste by the vested interest groups," he said. Mr Naveed said the whole process was carried out bypassing the Land Acquisition Act 1894 to pursue the agenda of the land mafia.

He demanded establishment of a judicial commission for carrying out the task of survey, allotment and compensation work under the Land Acquisition Act. He also called for publication of such a survey, and for inviting public objection as required under the provisions of the Act.


He said the resettlement work should be stopped till the completion of work by the judicial commission.


The action committee leader urged the President and the Prime Minister to institute a high-level inquiry into the 'irregularities committed' in the resettlement project.


He said the experts committee set up by the city government should be reactivated and empowered to take all vital decisions.

(D-15, 01/05/2003)

 

 

 

April 28' 2003

Lyari Expressway: human settlement issues

By Noman Ahmed


Despite popular resistance and concerns cited by the professionals on the design and execution process, the site clearance works are moving unabated for Lyari Expressway (LEW) until present.


A project directorate has already been set up to facilitate acquisition of plots in the various public housing schemes spread in the fringes of the city. In early April 2003, they even approached some nationalized commercial banks through the State Bank of Pakistan for loaning assistance.


However this resettlement attempt is in gross violation of internationally accepted norms as well as the wishes of the people. An international fact-finding mission visited Karachi in March this year at the request of the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights (ACHR) and the Habitat International Coalition (HIC)- the two prime bodies related to the rights of housing and associated issues. The mission comprised members from Indonesia, Thailand, South Korea and the Philippines.

It conducted interviews with the stakeholders of the project and studied the design and implementation mechanism. After its fieldwork and corresponding analysis, the mission released its interim report which shall be followed by a detailed final report covering the issues in an elaborate manner. Several specific concerns were cited by the mission in its initial report which were also presented in public meetings.


The mission pointed out the discrepancy in the basic statistics of the affected families which has prevailed for a considerable period of time. Government functionaries claim the affected households as 16000 while the people and various research organizations have estimated this number as 25000, based on the actual field findings.


Despite the fact that it has been cited on more than one occasion, the concerned governmental departments have not bothered to authenticate the claims outlined by the various research organizations. In addition, the government departments have refused to show the full list of the affected families. It is only a partial list which is made available and that too after a great deal of hassle. In short the whole attempt of the government's estimates of the affected is nebulous.

A sizable number of communities identified for eviction possess duly validated leases. The people, after securing legitimate rights of residence had to put up a massive effort to consolidate themselves. This process was spread on to several decades. They have acquired water, gas, electricity and telephone lines through their own efforts. In contrast to the investments made by the people in their services and houses/settlements, the government has announced a uniform package of compensation to all the evicted persons.


This package is neither commensurate with the cost or price of the houses nor takes into account the loss of locational advantage the people would have to bear as a consequence. As a norm, the settlement in general and the houses in particular constitute people's savings which they have done over the period of time. They are being deprived of their assets without even accounting for a fraction of losses inflicted on them.


The project management has been concealing vital information and decisions from the people and professionals. The fact-finding mission complained that they were not shown the detailed plans of LEW re-settlements action plan and environmental impact assessment. The timetable of the evictions is also kept secret which adds to the agony of the residents. Demolitions start suddenly with no prior warnings given to the people.


Communities pointed out that due to the 'shock' of sudden demolition of their houses, two residents died recently. Resettlement is a cumbersome procedure. It take at least six months to get a plot allotted. The affected families have to rent a house and then go through the hassle of shifting twice. The meagre Rs50,000 paid as the overall compensation gets spent in this interim period. The government functionaries must be knowing it all too well that not even a proper toilet can be built in Rs50,000, let alone a house.


A great deal of resentment is building up in the communities which consider the government actions unjust and unethical. The government has taken very inadequate steps to deal with the crisis compared to the human plight they have caused to happen.


Against 4000 families awaiting resettlement, 500 houses have been reported to be under construction. Infrastructure was yet to be provided. Education, health and social welfare facilities are not yet developed. They exist only at a distance from the resettlement site. Transportation is scanty and does not ply after 10 p.m. According to a report, a sick child died because the affected family could not take him to the hospital.


The mission consulted the technical committee. The committee reported a blackout on information which made the whole project entirely shady. The committee also reported that they were shown only the satellite maps of the area. No project details were shown to them. Besides the process of executing evictions are most unprofessional and unethical.


The evicted persons receive some slips mentioning that their dwellings are earmarked for demolition and that they would receive a flat compensation of Rs50,000. After receiving the slips, the demolition could take place any time totally unannounced. Heavy contingents of law enforcing agencies flanked by officials of the city government invade the site catching the residents by surprise. Normally this is done on a working day so that the male members of households are away for work. According to one government official, such a clandestine move is organised to avoid any resistance from the residents.


The mission also studied the Land Acquisition Act of Pakistan which lays down the conditions and procedures for acquiring land by the government for any cause of public interest. However in the LEW, no such procedure is followed which greatly adds to the harms and shocks of the residents. Besides, on the review of city plans and development strategies developed for the city of Karachi, it was found that LEW is merely a highway project.


It has never been a part of any larger city plan. Interestingly, the Northern Bypass which was developed in the Karachi Master Plan 1973-85 and other following plans, has been left at the back burner. Despite the fact that it is technically logical and socially viable, Northern Bypass is currently ignored. The whole resettlement exercise has done considerable damage to the livelihoods of people. Demolition and dislocation of shops and commercial enterprises, loss of jobs to various workers and shut down of several vendor operations which were feasible only in Lyari are a few outcomes in this regard.


The mission has drawn four interim conclusions. One, the feasibility of the LEW is doubtful. This is ascertained by the fact that the government resents sharing project information and is not keen to convene the technical committee for review. Two, the objective of the city government to clear Lyari corridor and provide these poor a decent housing is faulty and disastrous. The poor will not be able to recover from this shock before at least a decade.


It is also against the regularization process of settlements to which Pakistan claims a success. Three, communication gap between the people and government is rising. And four, the whole attempt is in contravention to international agreements such as the international Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to which Pakistan is also a signatory.


The mission recommended to activate the technical committee; initiate a project review and stop the evictions concurrently conduct a comprehensive socio-economic survey jointly by the government, civil society organizations and the people; ensure adequate representation of the targeted groups and hold another fact finding mission after no more than six months.

(Dawn, Eco & Bus Review, 28/04/03)

 

 

 

 

March 05' 2003

 

Lyari Expressway be expedited: PM

 

Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali has directed the federal and provincial authorities of Sindh to remove snags in the Lyari Expressway Project at Karachi, to be completed in June 2004.

 

Official sources told Dawn here on Tuesday that the prime minister directed the officials concerned to make sure that the Rs5 billion Lyari project was not delayed due to various problems.

 

One of the major problems was said to be a row over resettlement of displaced persons. The Planning Commission was asked to coordinate with the ministry of finance and the chief minister of Sindh to get the Lyari project completed on time.

 

However, the sources said the project was not likely to be completed by June next year even though Rs455 million, out of the allocated Rs900 million in the current financial years's Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), had been spent during the first quarter, which constituted 50 per cent of the money set aside.

 

According to the planning Commission, the National Highway Authority (NHA) has not provided the report on physical progress so far achieved towards completion of the vital project.

 

The project envisages construction of a 16.5km, two-lane expressway with allied structures.

 

The Planning Commission has formulated a status of a number of infrastructure projects approved earlier by the government.

 

About the Karachi Northern Bypass Project, it said that as far as physical progress was concerned, only 1.3km of  earthwork had been completed. The completion of the project was due in June 2004. The project aims to construct 62.137km, two-lane bypass road with allied structures. The estimated cost of the project is Rs2.6 billion with no foreign exchange component.

 

The Planning Commission also said that the expenditure incurred on the Kohat Tunnel and Access Road project up to June 2002 was Rs3.9 billion which was 59 per cent of the total allocation. As against the allocation of Rs1.6 billion in the PSDP 2002-03, Rs125 million have been utilized during the first quarter of the year, which is 8 per cent of the allocation.

 

The progress on the projects is according to the schedule.  About the Islamabad-Peshawar Motorway, the Planning Commission said the NHA was facing a problem in the encashment of a Rs16.8 billion bank guarantee paid as advance to the contractors. 

(Daily Dawn, 05/03/03)

 

 

 

February 16' 2003

Lyari Expressway Resettling old scores

 

Construction of the Lyari Development Resettlement Project Hawkes Bay is in full swing, where government hopes to establish a participatory community. But residents have their own tales to tell "Bulldozers were destroying the rows of the houses when suddenly I realised that I had left my three-year-old child sleeping inside the room. I dashed in to rescue my child. Luckily we both managed to get out of the room before the roof collapsed," recalls Mehboob, 42. He is now living in his half-constructed house (L-347), allotted to him in Hawkes Bay in exchange of his house at Bakra Peerhi, which was demolished during the Lyari Expressway (LEW) demolition operation last year.

Mehboob, who was as gorkan at Mewa Shah Graveyard, has been out of work for the last seven months due to an injured foot. The unfortunate incidence happened while he was rescuing his child. His nine-member family now depends on the eldest child, a 14-year-old boy who works as a labourer.

While talking to TNS Mehboob says, "All of my Rs.50,000 compensation money, given by the government to build the house in the 165-acre colony has been consumed. Half of the money has been spent on filling the plot lying in a dry nullah, and the rest on raising this half-constructed boundary wall. And even this was made possible only with the help of a kind neighbour who helped me buy the reti bajri trucks on concessional rates. However, I have been provided bricks to complete the structure following the visit of some higher officials to the area recently."

President General Pervez Musharraf inaugurated the 16.5km LEW project on 27 April 2002 in order to address traffic problems in Karachi. With wide roads, huge water tanks, freshly constructed buildings bearing the signs of school and dispensary and the ongoing construction activity around, the housing scheme--Lyari Development Resettlement Project Hawkes Bay, initiated for the families relocated from a settlement sitting along the sewage channel gives a pleasant look. But the impression fades as soon as one meets the families living there.

Saeed Ahmed, an old man who sells sweet supari and toffees at a table stall, moved in to Hawkes Bay (L-299) two months ago. He renovated his house at Akbar Road for the marriage of one of his sons just a few months before the demolition started. But since he has moved here he has been facing problems for his sons have refused to move in with him. His 80 square yard house, which he built after taking a Rs.40,000 loan, is too small to accommodate them all. He has appealed to the government to allot him another plot so that he could bring his family together.

Jehanara, a Bengali-speaking woman, is in distress. Some constructor has run away with her money (Rs.35,000) with the promise of constructing her plot (L-164). With an ailing husband and a son to look after, she is looking for help to recover her money.

Rahat Bux, popularly known as Buxoo Chacha, has been living in the four-room house (L-217) with his entire family (including three married sons) since August 2002. It costs him Rs.115,000. He has a sad story to tell: "As per the demolition plan, I was entitled to have two plots in lieu of my two houses at Akbar Road, measuring 100-square-yard each, which I bought in 1962 and 1992. But I have been allotted only one plot at Hawks Bay despite reported official statements that 'one plot has been allotted against the affectees' single storey and two same sized plots for a double storey building'. Although I have presented my case to high government officials, but no body seems to be interested in solving my case."

Buxoo's wife, Iqbal, says that with four families crammed in a four-room house on an 80-sqr-yard plot, they are facing extreme difficulties. "On one hand, the human cost and environmental impact has not been taken care of by the proponents of LEW project; and on the other, the allotment process lacks transparency. They claimed to have issued plots and compensation checks to 3,500 of 5,000 families but never issued the list of allottees," says Muhammad Younus, director, Urban Resource Centre (URC).

The irony of the matter is that some people have not gotten plots despite heir genuine claims, while some have been allotted plots although their claims are fakes.

According to the civic planning rule, low-income communities should be rehabilitated closer to the place of their livelihood instead of being pushed outside the city. "And this is the reason why people are selling plots at throwaway prices as they cannot afford to live away from the city," says Younus.

Only 200 out of 5,000 affected families have moved in to the Hawkes Bay settlement, while construction work started on about 375 plots. The locality has not been provided with any sewerage line. Each family has dug an eight feet deep pit outside the house that is linked to the toilet with a drainpipe.

"A serious environment crisis could arise with the arrival of new families," fears Younus.

Besides, there is no power or ga