|
Sugar
Land City
Sugarland
City
Arif
Hasan’s Views
(June
21, 2007)
Four
Principles of Urban Planning
Urban
Development (such as Sugarland City) has to be based on some principles of
sustainability (which also includes equity and justice). Four basic
principles are given below.
1.
Planning should respect the ecology of the areas in which the urban centres
are located.
2.
Landuse should be determined on the basis of social and environmental
considerations and not on the basis of land value or potential land value
alone.
3.
Planning should give priority to the needs of the majority population which
in the case of Asia are low and lower-middle income communities, hawkers,
informal businesses, pedestrians and commuters.
4.
Planning must respect and promote the tangible and intangible cultural
heritage of the communities that live in the city.
If
these four principles are not followed the city will not be able to
withstand natural disasters; it will lose its natural assets; it will be
divided into rich and poor ghettos which will be in conflict with each
other; its landuse will be irrational and hence its transport systems will
be inappropriate; and it will be socially fragmented and politically
unstable.
Other
Considerations
In
the coastal areas in question the requirements of four different
stakeholders have to be reconciled with each other, on the basis of social
and environmental considerations, with profit seeking international capital.
These stakeholders are;
1.
The flora and fauna of the area. This consists of migratory birds, fish life
and its nurseries, turtles, mangrove marshes (which are the outfalls of
drainage channels) and mud flats that sustain fauna and flora. It also
includes the potential of preserving some extraordinary scenic areas such as
the region of the Hub Delta and the islands beyond it.
2.
Fishing communities that have lived here for centuries and whose folklore
and festivals are recorded in texts as old as the 11th
century and in Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai’s Sur Ghato.
3.
The lower and lower middle income Karachiites who flock to these beaches in
search of recreation and entertainment and the services sector (camel men,
snack charmers, hawkers, jugglers, etc) that caters to their needs.
4.
Land owning agencies and people.
To
reconcile these interests, from the planning point of view, the following is
required.
1.
No reclamation from the sea or of mangrove marshes, mud flats or fish and
turtle nurseries and the land that they require for survival should be
permitted. Such reclamation will destroy the flora and fauna of the area.
One of the major reasons of Karachi’s flooding during the rains is the
encroachment on the mangroves of the China Creek backwaters by the KPT
Colony.
2.
The fishing communities should have access to the sea for fishing purposes
and their traditional villages and land should be protected/preserved. Also,
lower and lower middle income groups and their services sector should have
access to the beach. This can be done by following well-established beach
development byelaws that are operative in our neighbouring countries. These
byelaws will guarantee that no development will take place between the high
water mark and 150 metres beyond it and that this area will be accessible to
everyone (in the case of Maharashtra, this distance is 500 metres). Where a
road exists along the coast, no development will take place between the road
and the high water mark on the seaward side.
3.
No sewage, treated or untreated, will be discharged into the sea.
4.
The planning of the coastal area will be done on the basis of an urban
design exercise keeping in view the four basic principles of planning and
the considerations mentioned above. This urban planning exercise can only
take place after the project has become an integral part of the Karachi
Master Plan and adjustments in the plans related to the landuse,
transportation, solid waste management, water, sewage and related issues are
carried out.
14th
June, 2007
EDO
(MPGO), CDGK
Dear
Ifthikar Kaimkhani,
Regarding
development of the 42km Karachi beaches, the following points are
noteworthy:
1.
Under the common-law 'Public Trust Doctrine', all citizens must have
100% access to the beaches for swimming, fishing, boating, recreation, ocean
gazing, etc. There must be no 'private' beaches.
2.
Karachi lies at the confluence of the Arabian, Indian and Asian tectonic
plates. Sub-duction of the plates gives rise to tsunamis, some of which have
adversely affected the Karachi coast in the past. Additionally, construction
on soft soils near the sea is vulnerable to seismic damage (liquefaction of
soil).Sri Lanka intends to ban construction within a 100m coastal zone
around the country and a 200m zone in the North and Eastern province. The
Sri Lankan government has also announced its decision to regulate all new
construction in a 700m zone beyond the 300m coastal zone declared under the
Coast Conservation Act No 57 of 1981.
3.
The UNDP/KDA coastal development plan called for no construction within 50
meters of the high-water mark. This is insufficient clear space, and must be
extended to at least 150 meters or to the landward side of the beach access
road.
4.
The Indian Ministry of Environment & Forests notification under section
3(1) and section 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and rule
5(3)(d) of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 declared coastal
stretches as Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) and regulate activities in the
CRZ (Act downloadable from http://envfor.nic.in/divisions/iass/notif/crz.htm).
No construction activities are allowed within 500 metres of the high tide
line or on the seaward side of existing roads. ( Kiya hum Indians sey kum
hain?). Also download http://tcdc.undp.org/sie/experiences/vol3/Coastal%20India.pdf
5.
KBTPR 2002 Chapter 23 'Coastline Recreational Development' defines
the Karachi coast line (from Hub Estuary upto Gharo Creek) as an ' Interim
Control Area'. The 'Standards for Land Development ' (Chapter 17
of KBTPR 2002) define the purpose and the regulations of Interim Control
Areas.
6.
In 'Guidelines for Sensitive & Critical Areas' (downloadable from
http://www.environment.gov.pk/eia_pdf/f_Crit_%20Areas.pdf
)
formulated under the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997,
protected areas are established to
o
safeguard the earth's precious biodiversity
o
protect outstanding areas of natural beauty, and
o
conserve areas of cultural significance.
In
Pakistan there exists a system of protected areas for the protection of
endangered species, habitats, ecosystems, archaeological sites, monuments,
buildings, and other cultural heritage.
The
threats to protected areas in Pakistan are commercial-industrial pressures
including mining, logging, development projects, and
mis-managed tourism.
In
the 1977 'List of Notified Protected Ecosystem in Pakistan' are Hawksbay/Sandspit
Beaches as wildlife sanctuaries, including the nesting area for the
endangered Green Turtles.
7.
There will be adverse effects on military installations at Keamari (Pakistan
Navy) and Mauripur (Masroor Air Force Base).
Sincerely,
Roland
deSouza
Sugarland
City will threaten fisherfolk’s livelihood
Fisherfolk
at the Sandspit and Hawkesbay beach, fifteen kilometers south west of
Karachi, have been worrying since long at their dwindling catch. They
attribute this misfortune to the activity of deep-sea trawlers and use of
fine mesh nets locally known as Gujja, Katra and Bhola nets that do not
spare even the juvenile fish.
Now they have more to worry about with the development of “Sugarland City,”
a private resort the government is setting up on the Sandspit and Hawkesbay
beach in cooperation with a private Dubai-based developer. Fishermen of the
area say that this destroy the mangrove forests that happen to be nurseries
of fish and shrimps.
“Several fish species including Hira, Dhotar, Surmai, Pomphret besides
lobsters are found here but our catch has been reduced drastically due to
the operation of deep-sea trawlers that poach in shallow waters and take
away the entire bounty,” said Dawood, 38, a local fisherman.
“Some times I get 10 pieces of Surmai but at times I hardly manage to get
a piece. A single piece of Surmai, if it is big, fetches 1,000 rupees. If it
is small, then I get 300-400 rupees,” he added.
“Twenty years ago, the catch was so good that our entire boat would be
overflowing with fish,” he recalled.
He said the area also had lots of crabs that fetched a good price at 5-star
hotels of Karachi but Bengali fishermen who use banned Gujja, Katra and
Bhola nets have almost drained this resource.
Pointing out to the lush green mangrove forests on one side of the beach,
Dawood said nobody had planted them. “They have grown naturally and
shrimps and different fish species spawn in these forests. But the mangroves
face extinction due to development activity and when Sugarland City will
materialize, they would be destroyed totally, rendering us jobless,” he
commented.
The total area of mangrove forests in Sindh’s Indus Delta is about 250,000
hectares and that of Balochistan’s Makran coast is now estimated at only
7,500 hectares, i.e. 3% of the total mangrove forest coverage at the coastal
areas of Pakistan. In view of their relatively small coverage, the mangroves
in Balochistan could easily disappear if no proper action is taken, while
those of Sindh are under severe pressure. This warning was highlighted in
the Tropical Rainforest Portfolio 1996-2001, a study undertaken by the
Netherlands government and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Zeist, the
Netherlands.
Fisherfolk who have been living in small settlements in Sandspit/ Hawkesbay
for centuries, also fear that the massive Sugarland City project with an
estimated cost of several billion would deprive them of their ancestral
land. “We will become homeless when construction starts here on a big
scale,” Dawood said.
(By
Shahid Husain, The News-13, 02/06/2007)
Sugarland
City will uproot 200,000 people’
As
many as 200,000 poor people living in the Union Council-8 (Keamari) will be
uprooted if the multi billion dollar Sugarland City project is implemented,
Mubarak Baloch, Nazim UC-8, the area where the project will be built, told
The News. Public resentment has started to grow on this project which is
being seen as one that will uproot many to serve a few.
The elected representative of the area where Sugarland City will be built
has said that no effort was made to take him or the residents of the area
into confidence by the government. “UC-8 has 104 Goths (villages) under
the jurisdiction of Karachi Port Trust, City District Government Karachi and
the Board of Revenue but unfortunately we have not been taken into
confidence by the government regarding Sugarland City,” he disclosed.
The Nazim of UC-8 told The News that a meeting of his union council was held
on Thursday where a resolution showing concern about the project was
approved unanimously. Copies of this resolution are being sent to Sindh
Chief Minister, Dr. Arbab Ghulam Rahim, Governor Dr. Irshad-ul-Ibad, City
Nazim Mustafa Kamal and Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Fazalur Rehman.
However, many comment that this may be a attempt in futility.
“UC-8 has 9 Dehs (hamlets), including Deh Lal Bakar, Deh Mindiari, Deh Mun,
Deh Allah Bano, Deh Chatara, Deh Gabopat, Deh Mochka, Deh Gondpass and Deh
Mawaich and every deh has several goths (villages). Musharraf Colony and 500
Quarters also known as Gulshan-i-Benazir are also included in the area. The
radious of UC-8 extends up to 80 sq km and it will be destroyed by Sugarland
City,” Mubarak Baloch added. The mega project would also lead to
demolishment of 970 huts on the Sandspit/ Hawkesbay beach.
The western part of Sandspit/Hawkesbay is an open sandy beach, extending for
about 10km. The beach composes fine and coarse particles of sand and
according to one estimate, more than 100,000 people from Karachi and
upcountry visit the area annually.
Many of these people come and spend their time at privately owned or leased
huts.
These huts are now also under threat. Under the grand Sugarland plan, the
huts will be eventually removed to make way for the development of this
project. This is a tricky proposition.
“Every hut is valued at Rs 2-10 million and is owned by national and
multinational companies, embassies and also locals. During June-August, most
of these huts are frequented by people and provide livelihood to local
population. But with the advent of Sugarland City, people will be rendered
jobless,” said Nadir Baloch who owns a hut in Sandspit/Hawkesbay beach.
Times are changing fast and the once peaceful area is now becoming less
secure, partially due to the political situation in the city. Chowkidars at
the Sandspit/ Hawkesbay beach complain of rise in theft and robbery. “If
somebody is looted on the roads, chowkidars at the huts are usually held
responsible by the police,” said Liaquat Ali, 28, a chowkidar at a hut
owned by businessman Ashraf Lakhani. He has been a chowkidar at the hut for
18 long years but complains about the highhandedness of an ethnic
organization. There are allegations that this is being done to scare away
hut owners. So far, this cannot be proved.
But what can be proved is that hut owners are actively being discouraged
from staying on. “The annual tax we paid two years ago was Rs 600. Last
year it was raised to Rs 25,000 per annum. Now the authorities are not ready
to accept even that amount because they want to make us defaulters and
evacuate us,” he said. “We have filed a case in a court of law against
such excesses,” he added.
Amazingly, no Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) that is a legal
requirement of all mega projects has been carried out and nobody knows how
the area would be provided water, electricity and other amenities.
“I think the most important thing is not to have isolated projects in the
city but to relate this to the overall land use and infrastructure resources
in the city because any development is relative to whatever exists in the
city,” said Perveen Rahman, an architect and director of Orangi Pilot
Protect-Research Training Institute.
“The location of Sugarland City is where there are many old Goths
(villages) where people live and the right to live is much more important
than the right of recreation. Then nobody knows from where the mega project
will be provided water and other amenities. They always make claims about
self-electricity but we know this will not happen,” she concluded.
(By
Shahid Husain , The News-13, 26/05/2007)
Sugarland
City brings bitter taste to Karachi beaches
The
coastal area of Karachi is on the brink of a massive makeover. According to
documents received by The News, a new project by the name of Sugarland City
is nearing its launch stage. The master plan of Sugarland City involves “development”
of most of the city’s public beaches, such as Hawkesbay and Sandspit as
well as Manora and Cape Monze.
If this project is allowed to go ahead, the city’s main public beaches
will be privatised as will one of the main recreation spots of Karachi —
despite the hue and cry created by various public quarters.
The project has been initiated by “Limitless”, which is the first
integrated real estate developer launched by “Dubai World” - a private
developer. “Dubai World” happens to be the parent company managing and
supervising a portfolio of businesses and projects. “Sugarland City” is
going to be the first overseas project for “Limitless”.
The first announcement of the project came on Dubai World’s website on 5th
June, 2006, where it stated that Limitless will develop the Karachi Water
Front project. This was followed by the news that a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) has been signed by Pakistan’s Minister of State and
Privatisation and Investment Umar Ahmad Ghuman and Dubai World chairman
Sultan Bin Sulayman.
The (MoU) was followed by a high-level meeting held in Islamabad on June 24,
2006, which was chaired by Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz. A number of
important directives were given to different ministries including those of
Ports and Shipping, Defence, as well as the government of Sindh.
It was decided in this meeting that, since the area indicated by Dubai World
is very large, the development may start in phases. According to the
documents available, in the first phase Manora area, along with Sandspit and
areas behind it in the Karachi Port Trust (KPT) western back waters, upto
KPT’s land limits with Hawksbay, would be offered to the group.
In the second phase, while developing the Hawksbay Beach front, it would be
ensured that a few portions are left open for the general public for
recreational purposes. This would mean that the people would be restricted
to limited areas for enjoyment purposes.
At present, the beach not only serves the purpose of recreational
activities, but individuals also have huts located there, which are given to
them on lease. The most important point related to the huts in the meeting
was the premature cancellation of land leases, “after thoroughly examining
the situation.”
It was proposed in the same meeting that there should be a proper mechanism
for shifting the navy and cantonment board’s facilities located at Manora
to the Navy land at Cape Monze area.
After the meeting, these directives were forwarded to the government of
Sindh on 7th October, 2006. From here, the work gained momentum according to
the dates provided in the documents. There were reminders from the District
Coordination Officer (DCO) City District Government Fazlur Rahaman to
Executive District Officer (EDO) revenue, CDGK. This reminder termed the
directives from the Prime Minister to be of ‘high priority’.
Through out the above work, there has never been any ‘official’
announcement from the federal government related to the Sugarland City
project. Nor were there any reports in the media related to this mega
project. However, on 22nd February, 2007, City Nazim Syed Mustafa Kamal
briefed journalists about the project and also gave details of the project
being finalised with an agreement being signed in March 2007.
It was also said that the project has the approval from the President. This
was for the first time that the project was officially announced and got
coverage by the media.
This project involves an area of 60,000 acres of area with a total
investment of 68 billion US dollars that has been approved by the Federal
government. The first phase of the project would involve investment of $2
billion over the next ten years. It is also expected to involve much larger
investments in the later phases.
According to the latest reports on the project, notices have been issued to
all those hut owners coming under the project’s jurisdiction. The notice
states that all those huts that are in violation of the hut by-laws would
have their leases cancelled with immediate effect whereas the leases of
those huts that are not in violation will not be renewed as and when their
term expires.
(By
Sidra Rafique, The News-13, 25/05/2007)
|